I feel you are going about this wrong. Toss the indicators. I'm not going to tell you how to trade though. If you want training from me then you would have to pay up.
What you are doing is fundamentally wrong, you are choosing an arbitrary systematic method that has no systematic basis for working.
Also if I were you, I'd do what your senior mentor/trader says and not listen to anyone else. Someone who makes money.
One thing you could try to keep you in the game (but that has no real edge) is just take long trades. This will work as long as the market keeps going up.
BTW are you with title per chance? It sounds like they aren't giving you much room. With those loss limits, you don't need to worry about cutting any losers.
EVERY rule has an implicit assumption. If I set a rule/goal "be consistent" then this implies that being consistent has logical but being consistent is only rational/logical IF the market is consistently the same (stationary) which it is not. If my rule is TAKE EVERY TRADE that my system signals but my system doesn't have an edge then taking every trade will be losing.
If my rule is to be disciplined.. what is disciplined? I will limit my times of trading, my markets, etc. being disciplined may or may not have any correlation to being profitable. ONLY if those rules produce profitability!
What I find that works better then rules is principles because principles allow profiting from rare opportunity. Prefer to think in principles over rules.
It sounds like you have no observational model for success. I see many new traders fall into this trap. In other words, it sounds like you haven't even observed the market but have already built a profitable trading system. Congratulations! Instead of focusing on trading, you should start to focus on the market.
Quote from bhardy307:
Thanks everyone for your input.
I was very strict with my losing trades, and got out quickly ( except for one, where I was stupidly stubborn. it worked in my favor. I was lucky! ).
What basis do you have to believe you were "stupidly stubborn"? Your behavior produced a win. Where did this knowledge you posses about cutting losing trades come from? Why do you believe you were lucky?
I'm trying to help you. Hope you see that. One thing that will help you is to go ahead and take full responsibility for all wins and losses. I'm stating you need to right now accept there is no luck involved.
There are 2 spectrum of trader psychology: internalizing and externalizing. That is one can associate a win or loss to one's own actions or to external actions.
By saying you were "lucky" indicates that you did not produce your win, indicating externality, indicating non control. This modal operation tends to be more useful for traders who have working systems, which you don't indicate that you possess. It is most useful for trading highly painful methods which you are not given enough rope to even try that.
Given this, right now you need to accept EVERY win and every loss is 100% your own. No luck involved. No chance. No randomness. This will put you ahead of the pack by over a mile.