The argument you are trying to make here is similar to one of the panel respondents on a recent Charlemagne the Odd show where he calls the De Saintes move, "genius". Now you are really reaching.
Importantly, there is a difference between being hospitable with your own bread, and hospitable with bread belonging to others. Biden's policies are forcing some of our population to be more hospitable than they can afford to be. You are implying that these people are not hospitable at all, even though by percentages, they have likely contributed more toward general hospitality than Biden himself, out of his own personal funds, or out of the personal funds of anyone one Martha's Vineyard.
Percentages are important, if you go by one of Jesus' alleged parables, called the parable of the widows mite. It's about a widow who had not much money, like two mites to her name, but gave one mite as donation to the temple or something. A rich man comes along and gives much more in terms of actual amount of money, but as a percentage of his own net worth, he gave much much less than the poor widow.
Similarly, any red state is likely to give, gladly, up to a certain point. When you start to force them to give much more than you yourself are willing to give, as a percentage of your own net worth, then you start to act like an enemy. Worse, you start to act ungrateful when you imply the red areas don't have any hospitality to begin with.
Forcing other people to pay for the excesses of your own charities is disgusting.
