If these charts are authentic then why haven't they been peter reviewed, where is the data used to generate them? Who are the scientists and who do they work for.
If the paper was peer reviewed, show me the peer reviewed journal where it was published, putting a list of names on a paper hosted on some random blog doesn't mean it was peer reviewed at all.
Your chart is as fake as your claim that it was peer reviewed.
you brought up bullshit from another thread.
then when I explained the context you repeated the same out of context b.s. again. and then you did it again. this was explained to you on the other thread and this thread.
instead of attempting to respond with content... you trolled out the same out of context b.s.
that is what a troll does.
I already countered your argument multiple times.
yet you made it again.
so pointing out you are troll, trolling is not a fallacious ad hom... its an accurate description of what you just did ... again.
Coming from you that's a compliment. Found that peer reviewed paper yet?
Amusing in view that Mann and the other culprits refuse the release the adjusted data used to generate their charts.
That reminds me of the fake news rightists were posting about how Mann is 'ruined' because of that court case. Your side lies and makes up fake news at a record rate. Just lie, let it slide, make up something else and nobody remembers the old lie. This also perfectly describes Trump.