STUDY: Liberals Tend To Be Weaklings

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

Not required I'd just kick your ass out.

and risk breaking a heel ? ?

how are you going to look walking into the restaurant with one high heel and one flat ?
 
Quote from Spike Trader:

and risk breaking a heel ? ?

how are you going to look walking into the restaurant with one high heel and one flat ?


Sometimes a question reveals much more than the answer.
This is such an occasion.

I wear Men's clothing and shoes, which evidently you're not terribly familiar with.

BTW: That you're a cross dresser will just be our lil secret,kay panzi.

PS: Of course now we know what "spike" in your username means.
 
Hey, all you tough guys arguing. Someone took a picture of you all.

01-e-thug.jpg
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

If Mav decides to be an ass, I cannot go to jail. Not yet.

Not saying that Mav might be a redneck with a chip, but if he is, I have a lot more to lose than he does.

No different than when they tell military, if someone challenges you, walk away. If they beat your ass, you lose. If you beat their ass, you lose.

Most of you would never have the balls to say to me what you say here.

Here is the No. 1 trouble-maker on this board.
 
Crikey people... this thread at some points is hilarious ... at other points it brings out the lack of civility that pollutes all of the political discussions in our modern era.

For the record, when I go to the bar I enjoy meeting people... even those who have different opinions to me. If they want to have a civil discussion I will both listen and make some points. I don't go out because I want to 'kick someone's butt' or cause some type of conflict - that's the last thing I want. I ain't a 'internet tuff guy' - nor am I one in the corner pub.

If I ever have the opportunity to meet anyone on the ET threads I hope they would enjoy having a couple of beers with me while discussing our favorite P&R posts.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Crikey people... this thread at some points is hilarious ... at other points it brings out the lack of civility that pollutes all of the political discussions in our modern era.

For the record, when I go to the bar I enjoy meeting people... even those who have different opinions to me. If they want to have a civil discussion I will both listen and make some points. I don't go out because I want to 'kick someone's butt' or cause some type of conflict - that's the last thing I want. I ain't a 'internet tuff guy' - nor am I one in the corner pub.

If I ever have the opportunity to meet anyone on the ET threads I hope they would enjoy having a couple of beers with me while discussing our favorite P&R posts.
I think that is probably true of most, if not all of us.

But, the political fighting is not just limited to the modern era. I tend to think it was even worse in centuries gone by.

You know there is a reason why dinner knives are dull and rounded. :D

The distinguishing feature of a table knife is a blunt or rounded end. The origin of this, and thus of the table knife itself, is attributed by tradition to Cardinal Richelieu around 1637, reputedly to cure dinner guests of the unsavoury habit of picking their teeth with their knife-points.[1]

Later, in 1669, King Louis XIV of France banned pointed knives in the street and at his table, insisting on blunt tips, in order to reduce violence.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Crikey people... this thread at some points is hilarious ... at other points it brings out the lack of civility that pollutes all of the political discussions in our modern era.

For the record, when I go to the bar I enjoy meeting people... even those who have different opinions to me. If they want to have a civil discussion I will both listen and make some points. I don't go out because I want to 'kick someone's butt' or cause some type of conflict - that's the last thing I want. I ain't a 'internet tuff guy' - nor am I one in the corner pub.

If I ever have the opportunity to meet anyone on the ET threads I hope they would enjoy having a couple of beers with me while discussing our favorite P&R posts.

Of course it's hilarious, that's what happens when people speak their mind.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Glad you mentioned that, we all know the "justice" system has some flaws.

Google is your friend, pspr.:)

Glad you mentioned google.

So I googled "congressional black caucus stupidity" and this was the FIRST HIT that came up.


1/3 of Congressional Black Caucus Members Were Named in Ethics Probes
February 21, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield Comments (30)

18
Print This Post Print This Post

If you are a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, the chances that you will eventually face an ethics probe are better than the odds of you becoming president, senator or a Nobel Prize winner.

The question is why.

According to a 2012 National Journal study, five of the six lawmakers under review by the House Ethics Committee were Black Caucus members. Yet just one in 10 House members belong to the group.

In 2009, all eight lawmakers under ethics investigation were African-American. Besides Jackson, they included Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., who was later convicted of accepting gifts from donors with business before his tax-writing panel and 11 other ethics violations.

All told, the Journal says, an astonishing one-third of sitting black lawmakers have been named in an ethics probe at some point in their Hill careers.

Some of this level of criminality can be explained by putting the Congressional Black Caucus members in context within the Democratic Party and the urban political machine. But that doesn’t quite cover it either.

What is notable about the Congressional Black Caucus members is how sloppy and unqualified they often seem to be. We often poke fun at Sheila Jackson Lee, but she’s not exactly an exception. There’s a basic gap between them and many high ranking African-American Democrats.

The corruption of the CBC isn’t an accident. If you look back at the careers of Jackson-Lee or Hastings, it becomes clear that their willingness to put their ethics and votes up for sale was a crucial factor in their political history.


http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreen...k-caucus-members-were-named-in-ethics-probes/


Quite simply if more blacks are in jail it's because more blacks are breaking the law.

Perhaps it's criminal stupidity or just low cultural morality or all three.

attachment.php


But of course we all knew that, it's just like a study telling us water is wet.
 
Back
Top