Study Finds Fake News Swayed Voters

[exGOPer]

Good grief, I'll ask again like I did at the start of this stupid thread. Who was opposing Gaddafi? Who made up the Libyan rebel force.

New flash! Some were Islamic jihadists... Only when their fighting for a side were supporting we don't call them ISIS. It's when the fights over and those same players turn against us, oh shit.

Hillary's State Dept. funneled them arms thru Qatar. Either She was complicit or derelict.

AGAIN- THOSE WERE NOT THE FAKE NEWS STORIES that were believed by voters.

Saying Libyan jihadists got their hands on US weapons is NOT THE SAME AS saying Libyan jihadists were sold those weapons by the US or Hillary.

THe SOS doesn't have any power to approve sales of weapons, only the POTUS does and the Undersecretary of the State who is directly appointed by the POTUS (not appointed by the SoS) gets to oversee the vetting and has no role in 'approving' anything. The State department doesn't get to funnel anything, the Pentagon does. And even if we assume all these facts do not exist and that she was complicit - it STILL DOESN'T PROVE that she APPROVED the SALE.

And I mean SALE, not just getting your hands on these weapons - which is not the same thing.

The fact that you are taking a completely tangential piece of news and using that to justify fake news is the very problem of fake news we are talking about.

And what happened to you bringing up Hillary's health, did you even bother to read the fake news that was being discussed? Is it that hard to be specific and not fabricate shit?

 

[SoesWasBetter]

i was fooled into voting for Trump

i want my money back

 

[SoesWasBetter]

Yep, I really should have voted for an incontinent old bag who's own husband hasn't touched since 1981

 

[exGOPer]

Yep, I really should have voted for an incontinent old bag who's own husband hasn't touched since 1981

You do know that your messiah is older than her, fatter than her and has banged so many diseased whores which has made him demented as evidenced by the series of incoherent tweets.

 

[Wallet]

AGAIN- THOSE WERE NOT THE FAKE NEWS STORIES that were believed by voters.

Saying Libyan jihadists got their hands on US weapons is NOT THE SAME AS saying Libyan jihadists were sold those weapons by the US or Hillary.

THe SOS doesn't have any power to approve sales of weapons, only the POTUS does and the Undersecretary of the State who is directly appointed by the POTUS (not appointed by the SoS) gets to oversee the vetting and has no role in 'approving' anything. The State department doesn't get to funnel anything, the Pentagon does. And even if we assume all these facts do not exist and that she was complicit - it STILL DOESN'T PROVE that she APPROVED the SALE.

And I mean SALE, not just getting your hands on these weapons - which is not the same thing.

The fact that you are taking a completely tangential piece of news and using that to justify fake news is the very problem of fake news we are talking about.

And what happened to you bringing up Hillary's health, did you even bother to read the fake news that was being discussed? Is it that hard to be specific and not fabricate shit?

Your study said that people believed the "fake news" that during her time as Secertary of State she approved weapons sales to Islamic Jihadists as well as ISIS.

From the Times, The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

Hillary was part of the Obama Administration as SOS during this time. And Islamic Jihadists were part of the Libyan Rebel forces, receiving said arms, in fact some of those would be called ISIS if they were fighting in a different front.

Where's the Fake News?

Either she knew what was going on or too ignorant to know who was on the recieving end.

 

[exGOPer]

Your study said that people believed the "fake news" that during her time as Secertary of State she approved weapons sales to Islamic Jihadists as well as ISIS.

From the Times, The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

Hillary was part of the Obama Administration as SOS during this time. And Islamic Jihadists were part of the Libyan Rebel forces, receiving said arms, in fact some of those would be called ISIS if they were fighting in a different front.

Where's the Fake News?

IF the Obama administration APPROVED sales to Jihadists (we have already moved away from Hillary doing it, now it's Obama admin and Hillary who was just a 'part') then why were they 'alarmed'. Do you not understand that a third party handing off part of what you sold them to someone else doesn't make you complicit in the act that you are accusing them of?

Let's even get more specific

From the article

But in the months before, the Obama administration clearly was worried

but other current and former administration officials said Washington had little leverage at times over Qatari officials.


So try and explain, how selling weapons to Qatar (which the Trump admin does as well) who then giving them to Jihadists justifies the fake news that Hillary Clinton as SOS signed off on arms sales to jihadists. If Obama admin knowingly sold these weapons to Jihadists, why were they worried? Why worry about leverage over Qatari officials if it was all done knowingly?

The very article that you used to justify the fake news destroys that narrative.

 

[Wallet]

IF the Obama administration APPROVED sales to Jihadists (we have already moved away from Hillary doing it, now it's Obama admin and Hillary who was just a 'part') then why were they 'alarmed'. Do you not understand that a third party handing off part of what you sold them to someone else doesn't make you complicit in the act that you are accusing them of?

Let's even get more specific

From the article

But in the months before, the Obama administration clearly was worried

but other current and former administration officials said Washington had little leverage at times over Qatari officials.


So try and explain, how selling weapons to Qatar (which the Trump admin does as well) who then giving them to Jihadists justifies the fake news that Hillary Clinton as SOS signed off on arms sales to jihadists. If Obama admin knowingly sold these weapons to Jihadists, why were they worried? Why worry about leverage over Qatari officials if it was all done knowingly?

The very article that you used to justify the fake news destroys that narrative.

Yes Hillary is as pure and innocent as the driven snow. I have not the time or desire to connect the dots for you so continue to post your deceptions.

http://www.businessinsider.com/benghazi-stevens-cia-attack-libya-2012-11

 

[exGOPer]

Yes Hillary is as pure and innocent as the driven snow. I have not the time or desire to connect the dots for you so continue to post your deceptions.

http://www.businessinsider.com/benghazi-stevens-cia-attack-libya-2012-11

Again with the strawman, nobody said that Hillary is pure and innocent and the fake news was not connecting the dots. It was making a specific claim when it had absolutely no evidence for it. This is the same pattern of how Obama was blamed in 2012 for Benghazi but when election time came in 2016, it was all Hillary's fault and she personally killed all those people. Obviously you only care about the narrative and not the facts,so believe your fake news.

 

[Poindexter]

I don't dispute assets in Europe could have reached Benghazi in time..... No brainier.

We had assets in Libya.

Obama and Hillary loving leftists can't grasp the simple fact that when the attacks were under way, nobody knew how long they would last. That's only known in hindsight. Therefore, help should have been deployed NO MATTER WHAT. But it wasn't because traitor Obama and his regime felt it was more important play politics than save American lives.

 

[exGOPer]

Obama and Hillary loving leftists can't grasp the simple fact that when the attacks were under way, nobody knew how long they would last. That's only known in hindsight. Therefore, help should have been deployed NO MATTER WHAT. But it wasn't because traitor Obama and his regime felt it was more important play politics than save American lives.

So why didn't a single Republican report blame Obama and Hillary for the lost lives. Where is your outrage for Trump ordering a mission over dinner which killed US soldiers.

Nothing but more hot air from pedophile's cult.