Difference is that was USDA home grown bullshit.
Study Finds Fake News Swayed Voters
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Difference is that was USDA home grown bullshit.
And do what with the planes, plow the fields with their cannons? Cluster bomb crowds of civilians blindly? Not a damned movie! If scores of women & kids had been killed and the ambassador survived (he would more likely have been extra killed by the seriously pissed remaining attackers) then Benghazi would have been about Hillary murderously killing women and children, endangering the good will and spoils of the "Arab Spring".
It is possible because it happened. As I understand the ambassador himself made a misjudgement on where to locate. Ambassadors are not children, they tend to be highly intelligent people, he may have paid for his mistake however was responsible for himself and his staff as a very grown man expected to exercise judgement. But he went to the wrong place that day having the very best knowledge of what was unfolding. Don't bother with a low blow to the dead comment.
Movies seem to have some Americans convinced that there is some all seeing eye to protect them. Ask a "military man" with experience, they are rightfully scared of their own side half the time when shit goes down.
A very important change in how people think started with the origin of the term "shit happens, why? because it does." Before this there always had to be a reason, in WWII pilots would blame 'gremlins' in their engine, magical ideas for good and bad events were everywhere until one day someone said, I don't know, shit just happened. There are limits to what can be known without 20/20 hindsight.
An endless panel of experts and the republicans themselves concluded the chain of events unfolded with an unfortunate result. Then dropped the whole thing once clear of the election.
Again, your last sentence is pure emotional reaching. Its not fair, they should have, somebody's fault.. that is not how the world is. Shit happens.
Your answer to when things go bad, it's just a scene from Fortest Gump "shit happens"?
I doubt Stevens was singlehandedly responsible for the location of the Consulate, he's on record asking for additional security.
The glaring elephant in the room no one addresses, on the anniversary of 9-11 in the middle of a ME war zone. We have an Ambassador/Consulate and no one has the fore site to station anything close just in case? With everything we have stationed throughout the world, there was no one to send.
It's not a question of what, Plane, Tank, Special Op, It's the official position there was nothing available in the area.
To that I call bullshit. Or someone up the line had their head in their ass.
Shit happens is a older than the movie Forrest Gump.
You are another Dunning Kruger effect sufferer, this site collects them, we have a little virtual colony.
You know better. You would not even give a damn had you not been programmed to react to this issue.
You just feel this could have been better. That is called magical thinking.
Lol, Dunning Kruger.... From a guy posting under the moniker SluttyButtFest, a legend in his own mind.
Good night.
See, this is the problem with you Cons.
The study didn't say that 'Hillary didn't have health problems' , the study was referring to the fake news that 'Hillary was in VERY POOR HEALTH due to SERIOUS ILLNESS"
And the second lie is about 'Hillary APPROVING weapons SALES to Jihadists" - your link shows that jihdaists got their hands on US weapons when rebels fled or when they switched sides. Where did it show that Hillary approved weapons sales to Jihdaists? The very fact that SoS is not the person in charge to approve sale of weapons should have been the first clue but ignorance is a given with you Cons.
You are a liar and a faker like the typical Trump turd, you can't be honest about the most basic things which can be easily fact checked. You completely changed the meaning of the 'fake news' that was being analyzed, made a tangential point and pretended the fake news is true.
You lied blatantly believing the very fake news that the study is about and calling the study fake when you can't even comprehend two basic sentences from the study.
Last edited:
Why would they, we are talking about birthers and pizzagaters here, these people live for their fake news.
There were no military assets in Libya, they had to rely on contractors for basic security. Again, read the REPUBLICAN Benghazi report, given your inability to read as we have already proved, your words are meaningless.
Good grief, I'll ask again like I did at the start of this stupid thread. Who was opposing Gaddafi? Who made up the Libyan rebel force.
New flash! Some were Islamic jihadists... Only when their fighting for a side were supporting we don't call them ISIS. It's when the fights over and those same players turn against us, oh shit.
Hillary's State Dept. funneled them arms thru Qatar. Either She was complicit or derelict.