D DrEvil Sep 18, 2007 #1 http://youtube.com/watch?v=6bVa6jn4rpE sorry in advance, yes this has nothing to do with trading. What happened to freedom of speach?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=6bVa6jn4rpE sorry in advance, yes this has nothing to do with trading. What happened to freedom of speach?
M marketsurfer Sep 18, 2007 #3 whoa, man! thanks for posting that, i hate cops who abuse their power/authority. surf
A ang_99 Sep 18, 2007 #4 why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand..
why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand..
M marketsurfer Sep 18, 2007 #5 Quote from ang_99: why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand.. More... your right, there is potentially stuff not on the tape--however, the tape in and of itself is pretty damning of the cops. surf
Quote from ang_99: why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand.. More... your right, there is potentially stuff not on the tape--however, the tape in and of itself is pretty damning of the cops. surf
D DrEvil Sep 18, 2007 #6 Quote from ang_99: why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand.. More... Perhaps they were positioned behind the microphone ... that's why they were behind him while he was speaking ...
Quote from ang_99: why were the cops standing behind him as he was asking the question? perhaps he showed signs of being disruptive before hand.. More... Perhaps they were positioned behind the microphone ... that's why they were behind him while he was speaking ...
S stupididiot Sep 18, 2007 #7 He was told not to ask any hard or disruptive questions, but he did anyway so he was zapped. And the problem is?
He was told not to ask any hard or disruptive questions, but he did anyway so he was zapped. And the problem is?
P paj Sep 18, 2007 #8 That clip is deceptive and doesn't tell the entire story. Eye witnesses said It wasn't his turn to speak and he had 'rushed' the microphone to ask the question. That is why the police were hovering around. The mic was then turned off and he was asked to stop. He didn't... this is where the video clip starts.
That clip is deceptive and doesn't tell the entire story. Eye witnesses said It wasn't his turn to speak and he had 'rushed' the microphone to ask the question. That is why the police were hovering around. The mic was then turned off and he was asked to stop. He didn't... this is where the video clip starts.
IanMacQuaide Sep 18, 2007 #9 Mayhaps they used non lethal technology to peacefully subdue a violent man who refused their directives to leave?
Mayhaps they used non lethal technology to peacefully subdue a violent man who refused their directives to leave?
M marketsurfer Sep 18, 2007 #10 it seems like it was the "skull and bones" question that triggered the cops to move in. thats downright scary, the conspiracy theorists will have a ball with this one. surf
it seems like it was the "skull and bones" question that triggered the cops to move in. thats downright scary, the conspiracy theorists will have a ball with this one. surf