Stu which church and which dogma said the world was flat

ART:
>Some people have trouble with the
>concept of highest.

And some people aim low and delude themselves into believing that IS the highest.

JB
 
Quote from ARogueTrader:

Nope.

Mass is the property of a body within a gravitational field.

Mass is not dependent on gravity for its existence.

There is no proof that mass "creates" the gravitational field.

They are separate.

It is pure theory that mass creates a gravitational field.

That two things happen at the same time does not prove cause and effect unless all other possible and possibly known factors are known.

It is a guess.

Science has guessed for centuries, and as knowledge deepens, the guesses change.


gravity is force of attraction between all masses. the gravitation between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them,

you uneducated and slow-witted nematode.



what happened, couldnt you faith this understanding into your pea brain??

here's site on your level,

well,

you still wont get it but here it is nonetheless..

http://amazing-space.stsci.edu/reso...he+cosmos@,capture,>Gravity@,capture,gravity,

elementary school is now out you moron. dont look to me to further your lack of education.


 
Quote from ARogueTrader:

Some people have trouble with the concept of highest.

you flatter yourself you fool. your head is up your as, granted its HIGH up your as but no higher.

:-/
 
ART:
>Mass is not dependent on gravity for its existence.

Wow. That's news to me -- NOT!

And I was certain mass couldn't survive weightlessness. I mean satellites just go poof when they get into space don't they?

JB

PS. Where do you get this earth shattering information from anyway - the back of a cereal box?
 
No, gravity is a field in which bodies of mass interact.

They call it the "gravitational field."

Bodies do not create the gravity within the gravitational field.

The field causes the attraction, not the bodies of mass.

"A gravitational field is the force field created around massive bodies that causes attraction of other massive bodies."

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/GravitationalField.html

The field is created around bodies, the bodies themselves don't create the field. Gravity does not emanate from mass, it is separate.

Of course, some people don't accept field theory as a deeper reality than Newton's theories.

Quote from LongShot:

gravity is force of attraction between all masses. the gravitation between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them,

you uneducated and slow-witted nematode.



what happened, couldnt you faith this understanding into your pea brain??
 
ART:
>Bodies do not create the gravity
>within the gravitational field.

Of course not. That is why sometime when the earth is here, the gravitational force that often accompanies it ends up over there.

Man I hate when that happens

JB
 
Apparently some people don't know the difference between mass and gravitational fields:

From GG:

"WRONG

i have gravity. you have gravity. a baseball has gravity."


No, he doesn't have gravity, nor does a baseball have gravity.

Bodies have mass which is separate from gravity.

Bodies are not a force, nor are they the cause of the force of gravity.


Quote from Turok:

ART:
>Mass is not dependent on gravity for its existence.

Wow. That's news to me -- NOT!

And I was certain mass couldn't survive weightlessness. I mean satellites just go poof when they get into space don't they?

JB

PS. Where do you get this earth shattering information from anyway - the back of a cereal box?
 
ART:
>Apparently some people don't know the
>difference between mass and gravitation
>fields

And you apparently have a reading comprehension problem. (and a real problem stating the obvious in science and believing it's news)

JB
 
Ad hominem.

Quote from Turok:

ART:
>Apparently some people don't know the
>difference between mass and gravitation
>fields

And you apparently have a reading comprehension problem. (and a real problem stating the obvious in science and believing it's news)

JB
 
Back
Top