TM:
>You have got to be kidding right?
About what?...your lies and fabrications? It matters not a whit whether I'm kidding or serious...they remain on the record.
>all i asked was that you applied the same
>requirements for gravity and the belief in god
>and you came up with Nothing , Nada, zilch...
You describe this call for a test as "Nothing, Nada, zilch..."?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=433583#post433583
In that thread I totally accept the notion that both should be tested by applying the same criteria. LET'S GO!!!!!!
>You can show me the 'effects' of gravity but
>little else....I can show you the effects of God
>but you won;lt accept that right?
As I continue to state and you continue to ignore...
>I (and all of those of like mind that I know) would
>happily believe in god if the evidence of his effects
>even *remotely* approached the repeatable, predicable
>nature of gravity.
That's from previous post of mine BTW (do you even read the posts on this thread?)
Why do you continue to insist that my position is different from the one that is stated here on the record?
JB