Stu which church and which dogma said the world was flat

Quote from Turok:

TM:
>You started the insults not me....

My "insults" are there in the record for all to see as are all your lies and fabrications.

I'm quite happy with the record thank you.

Put your son on, at least he's honest.

JB


You have got to be kidding right? all i asked was that you applied the same requirements for gravity and the belief in god and you came up with Nothing , Nada, zilch...You can show me the 'effects' of gravity but little else....I can show you the effects of God but you won;lt accept that right?
 
Quote from Turok:

TM:
>Show me a picture of Gravity....

By his comments and questions something leads me to believe that TM is a few bricks shy of a load when it comes to proofs.

One can show pictures of the *effects* of gravity, wind, heat, etc. Since these have proven to be infinitely (so far) repeatable and accurately (to a pretty sharp point) predictable it gets pretty easy for even a skeptic to believe.

JB

Could have sworn this was you....insulting, and avoiding the questions, and then proving my point that all you can show is the *effects* of gravity...
 
Quote from ElCubano:

no santa cluas...cmon...who brought me all those gifts this year :(

if this is what 'faith' represents to you ..then now we know why you have none...but this may not be what it represents to me ( thats just how life is ) ..... so you telling me that its stupid doesnt make sense....

your perception of love or lack therof may be different as mine...surely you dont love like i do or vice versa..you may in fact not belive in love....can science prove that i love my wife?? can they disect me, put me under the scope and find where this love is??? peace amigo...ill leave this alone....

love is a molecule. or partly so. we can say this but anything more is PURE SPEC. and you know how fallible pure spec can be.

i dont care what "faith" or "love" represents to you.. your fantasies and foibles have no meaning to me.. as mine have none to you.

now, if you have something more to show me (us) [something along a rational line] than residual childhood dreams,, we are waiting..

ahhh but alas all we have is your faith in your "faith".

what a disappointment, and you speak so confidently..

sigh.

:-/
 
TM:
>You have got to be kidding right?

About what?...your lies and fabrications? It matters not a whit whether I'm kidding or serious...they remain on the record.

>all i asked was that you applied the same
>requirements for gravity and the belief in god
>and you came up with Nothing , Nada, zilch...

You describe this call for a test as "Nothing, Nada, zilch..."?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=433583#post433583

In that thread I totally accept the notion that both should be tested by applying the same criteria. LET'S GO!!!!!!

>You can show me the 'effects' of gravity but
>little else....I can show you the effects of God
>but you won;lt accept that right?

As I continue to state and you continue to ignore...

>I (and all of those of like mind that I know) would
>happily believe in god if the evidence of his effects
>even *remotely* approached the repeatable, predicable
>nature of gravity.

That's from previous post of mine BTW (do you even read the posts on this thread?)

Why do you continue to insist that my position is different from the one that is stated here on the record?

JB
 
TM:
>Show me a picture of Gravity....

Again TM:
>Could have sworn this was you....insulting,
>and avoiding the questions,

There is no question there to avoid TM -- there is only a command.

Do you just enjoy looking foolish with your assertions?

JB
 
Quote from TM_Direct:

You have got to be kidding right? all i asked was that you applied the same requirements for gravity and the belief in god and you came up with Nothing , Nada, zilch...You can show me the 'effects' of gravity but little else....I can show you the effects of God but you won;lt accept that right?

what is god?

care to define her?

is she in your image?

what is nature of this "god" or yours..

i doubt you will or can..

we shall see

:-/
 
Quote from Turok:

TM:
>Show me a picture of Gravity....

Again TM:
>Could have sworn this was you....insulting,
>and avoiding the questions,

There is no question there to avoid TM -- there is only a command.

Do you just enjoy looking foolish with your assertions?

JB

Your doing it again...You avoid the question and then throw out insults....It seems like that is all your capable of doing....Why is that?
 
Quote from TM_Direct:

Your doing it again...You avoid the question and then throw out insults....It seems like that is all your capable of doing....Why is that?

Oh baby, pretty baby
Oh honey, you let me down honey
I ain't playin' childhood games
no more
I said it's time for me
to even the score
So stake your claim,
your claim to fame
But baby call another name
When you feel the fire,
and taste the flame

Back off, back off bitch
Down in the gutter dyin' in the ditch
You better back off, back off bitch
Face of an angel with the love of a witch
Back off, back off bitch
Back off, back off bitch




:p
 
I guess he does want to look foolish by calling a command a question.

I'll let him.

JB

PS. just let it be known that if there was a question there to answer, I'd answer it.
 
Quote from Turok:

I guess he does want to look foolish by calling a command a question.

I'll let him.

JB

PS. just let it be known that if there was a question there to answer, I'd answer it.

lol,, i told ya... Total Maroon = TM

:D
 
Back
Top