Its not. I grew up believing in evolution. I have no problem believing evolution happened after life formed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
String Theory Co-Founder: Sub-Atomic Particles are Evidence the Universe Was Created
- Thread starter FortuneTeller
- Start date
biblical believes in no way contradict science. So far science has not disproven a single thing of the account of creation as portrayed in the Bible. You choose what to believe in and so do I. And yes I can have it both ways, because just because science cannot explain something does not make it impossible to exist unless it's disproven.
So you are saying we have to be content with an invisible magic sky fairy explaining nothing and built upon this the world came into fruition through the collision of some dirt being breathed upon by a supernatural wizard from nowhere not existing in nature and not any common sense notion that the universe and life itself came about through natural circumstances of which every single thing there is, either contains or portrays evidence of. Any sort of imaginary concept must by any scientific logic come from somewhere.
You can't have it both ways. If you want to call on scientific logic, you can't rely on something not physical or material and not subject to explanation according to natural laws.
A) as stated I never denied life evolving. But still if one only believes what is scientifically proven then one must at some point ask the question where it all came from. Many world leading scientists ask this question and some agree that there must be a creator God and others don't.
B) if there is a creator God then he would have no issues creating fossils that look billions of years old and hence there is a possibility that life never evolved as much as some might want to think. The world might be much shorter in existence than even 100000 years by extension of such thought. Might I said. And again I never denied that organisms can evolve.
B) if there is a creator God then he would have no issues creating fossils that look billions of years old and hence there is a possibility that life never evolved as much as some might want to think. The world might be much shorter in existence than even 100000 years by extension of such thought. Might I said. And again I never denied that organisms can evolve.
Are you aware that you often make no sense?
You assume that before the big bang there was nothing. It is more likely that there was always something, it just changes form.
There are many plausible theories as to how life evolved and if one looks back in the fossil record life gets simpler and less diverse. The only earliest fossils are single celled organisms that stayed that way for some 1.5 billion years before getting their act together.
It becomes circumstantial when you extrapolate your bacterial observations to human beings or other life forms to the extent that you seem to suggest that humans evolved from lower life forms. There is absolutely not one scientific proof of such. And not sure why we even debate this I think by wide agreement life forms evolve over time. Yes. So now what?
It is not circumstantial in the case of bacteria. It's fact.
that's because what we call non life now has yet to be discovered as life1. there is no proof life evolved from non life. We don't even have a complete plausible pathway from non life to life. In fact many scientists are not looking to the idea that life may have arrived here from other places because it does not look like there was enough time for life to have evolved from non life here on earth.
2. Many if not the vast majority of Christians accept the idea that we have had evolution once life formed.
Lol. Yeah you mean the asteroids that hit early planet earth came to deliver life from another galaxy? "hello early planet earth, here are your bacterial cultures, and now go and evolve, and make the best of it. I come back after having circled all the other planets and check back in 24433.33227272 billion years to see how you have fared."
So where is the other galaxy from. Who or what created it?
So where is the other galaxy from. Who or what created it?
that's because what we call non life now has yet to be discovered as life
The Bible says that animals look up at the stars and know there is a God. These superior introvert personalities that are drawn to science have a hard time thinking that God could be smarter than them.
A) as stated I never denied life evolving. But still if one only believes what is scientifically proven then one must at some point ask the question where it all came from. Many world leading scientists ask this question and some agree that there must be a creator God and others don't.
B) if there is a creator God then he would have no issues creating fossils that look billions of years old and hence there is a possibility that life never evolved as much as some might want to think. The world might be much shorter in existence than even 100000 years by extension of such thought. Might I said. And again I never denied that organisms can evolve.
It did not have to come from anywhere. It just always was.
And it never will, because that would be impossible. Nor are scientists the least bit interested in proving or disproving the Biblical creation story any more than they would be interested in proving or disproving that Snow White lived with seven dwarfs.So far science has not disproven a single thing of the account of creation as portrayed in the Bible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lol yes humans did not have computers 2000 or 10000 years ago today they do. We evolved. Qed
Thanks for the science lesson teacher.
What? I reply to you with the link to show how the some christians concede. Read the link to see that. So much evidence to show the common ancestor of humans to chimpanzee.
Because you said this. I quote you.
conduit said:
Really? Where is that evidence? And I am also still waiting for some evidence that we descended from trees as monkeys. Even the Virgin Mary to me is way more credible than some of the evolutionist theories. Most of those make absolutely no sense, they don't even reconcile philosophically