Im repeat myself at this point but here goes.A system that recognizes where it works and in what conditions, can be used in conjunction with correlation-divergence systems, but not in and of itself. That is, if a counter-trend system to short an uptrend works, if may fail when there is a true downtrend. However, there are stocks that go up at those times, akin to an ecosystem; a low on X creates a high on Y at the same time, or within the same timeframe. The subtle shift is a signal of the changing tide. Dow Theory attempts to take advantage of this, although it is a crude method because it does not take enough information into account.
Testing to certainty seems unreasonable as far as shorter horizons go. If long term, inflation eventually makes the bull market go up, as it has been, even after Japan's crash to new highs. Capital can be raised if certainty is reached- but has it? That is, what is the certainty of certainty?
5000+ Samples=Certainty
Example: There are about 5000 forex market hours in a year. So if you test or trade a year's worth of an hourly trend system, that is certainty. Refer to my post outlining how to get to certainty on each timeframe.
I know its difficult to combat the idyllic mindset, its so easy to chalk things up as unreasonable or impossible. Its just so enticing isn't it, to do nothing in the face of tedious work and convince yourself that its unrealistic. Companies on the cutting edge don't think this way. Its your choice to be an audience member, watching the world be built around you. Its an indication of an apathetic state, minus the a.
Emotion fuels accuracy.
