Sounds like Christopher Hitchins isn't much of a fan of Kissinger's either
.
Fact is, I worked for the guy (Kissinger, not Hitchins). He was a brutal egotistical megalomaniac. But he was also a brilliant politician. His accomplishments were vast enough to include what Hitchins concludes as crimes against humanity as well as war crimes. But other accomplishments included his famous "shuttle diplomacy" in the middle east and his efforts with the Paris Peace Talks (both positive and counter-productive). Some of his efforts were worthy, many were in the pursuit of power (or the retention of it, obviously).
I don't know what to believe as far as Hitchins allegations. I do know that I would not be surprised by anything.
Kissinger also must be placed in context. The period of time that he was Secretary of State for Nixon was a tumultuous time. A time of government corruption, corrupted idealism worldwide, and a time of war. A very unpopular and IMO unjust war. A time of an emotionally unbalanced President and a time of enormous social upheaval both domestically and internationally.
I don't know what to think of Hitchins' allegations. I am sure there is more than a bit of truth to most of them. I am also willing to guess there is a bit of exaggeration to a few, and some are outright distortions.
However, having actually worked for the guy, I can say without a doubt that he was in a position in which he could not avoid "lose lose" circumstances on almost a daily basis.
Again, I am no fan of his. I disliked his politics, and I disliked him personally. Fortunately, my dealings with him were short in duration. I met him face to face only once for any significant time, and several times just in passing (although he was technically my superior). He put me in harms way, as he did so many.
What he was capable of accomplishing in a different era would make for interesting conjecture. But he was certainly an integral part of a sad chapter in our history. How much of the blame can be put on him is something I guess history will sort out.
It will interest me greatly to see if Hitchins allegations bear out. If they are swept under the rug or brought to the full light of day. So far, it seems all very speculative. The fact of the matter is that Kissinger has to live in the light of eminent domain. So Hitchins and anyone else can say whatever they please. Kissinger can't sue for libel, or slander. (Not implying he has grounds...I don't know). But that just makes it interesting. But not necessarily factual. Time will tell.
In any event, thanks for the links. Interesting reading!
Peace at virtually all costs;
Rs7
