Most, if not all, trading websites are bullshit. Papers are tractable, which means you can replicate the authors process and evaluate them with your own data set to find robust signals. Also, his original paper was in the 90s but there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of subsequent papers examining momentum (based upon his approach) since then. Your response illustrates an inexperience with both the scientific method and trading analysis. If you’re looking for the dumb money, I suggest looking at the mirror.He is not a site, his publications are from the last millennia, are in rag journals and he does not have performance data; if you think that is a valid reference you are in the wrong industry. Remember: 10 sites with actual trade performance data, not old papers.
Also— lol, what etfs/active funds do you know of that trades Fibonacci retracements? None. How many trade momentum? Momentum is arguably the most famous and widely traded market anomaly.