I think you should expect degradation over time, but that doesn't mean the system can't make money. If you find that backtested, profitable strategies regularly fail to make money in live trading, then I would suspect your process. One thing I have seen clearly over the years is that backtesting is not backtesting. Much of what I have seen called backtesting is nothing less than an insult to the whole endeavor.
I have traded historical-data-backtested strategies since 1999, in stocks, futures, and funds. Once I have discovered and implemented a profitable trading strategy, its performances always got worse and worse over time. None of my strategies remained profitable after 10 years.
I am curious whether other strategy traders have seen the same pattern? And how your guys manage this issue?
For me, I generally start to reduce my position in a strategy if it is unprofitable for a year. If the strategy remains unprofitable for another year or two, I stop trading it altogether. [My strategies usually generate dozens of trades a year; so a couple of years give me enough sample to suspect that the world has changed.]
