I'd be interested to experiment between Genesis stops and specialist stops. Which would give you a better fill?
Quote from SitrusTrader:
I'd be interested to experiment between Genesis stops and specialist stops. Which would give you a better fill?
Quote from BrownianMotion:
Serge,
First off, these stops will be a big help to traders who previously didn't have non-exchange stops. So you deserve applause for adding them. Hopefully more brokers will wake up and add non-exchange-held stops soon.
I have a few comments, however, in the spirit of offering constructive suggestions:
1) Client-side stops entail MUCH more slippage than server-side stops. For example, when a T-Stop is triggered, it means that a trade message had to travel to the trader's PC before his/her PC notified your server to execute the stop. Assuming a 75 millisecond ping time to your servers, this means there is a built-in 75 millisecond delay in T-Stops. That might not sound like much, but compared to REDI+ Sigma stops for example (which are server-side), your T-Stops will execute later every time--costing traders money. In short, client-side stops generally cannot compete with server-side stops.
2) If a trader's client goes down, or has internet trouble, client-side stops are useless.
3) T-Stops trigger off the last trade price. In the next revision you should allow them the option of triggering off bid/ask prices--which can save execution time because the stop doesn't have to wait for a print.