- originally by def -
i didn't mean to imply you shouldn't check all details as certainly mistakes can be made. What I clearly meant to say is that IB has a solid reputation and the implication that the firm does anything unethical with an order (i.e. doing anything but a best effort basis to obtain the best price available) was totally off base.
def,
Fair enough.
I respect the good reputation of IB. However that will never be enough to me, as I've been bitten by companies with excellent reputations as well (as already pointed out).
As for stops in particular, Turok has made it clear enough that tampering by IB with stops and with the way they are filled is extremely unlikely.
I will however, as you suggested, report anything that goes different than might reasonably be expected, to the helpdesk and ask for an investigation.
And I'll be frank to you: Yesterday's stop went fine. It went live immediately, and I got filled almost at the ask (short position).
I still have to agree with vvv too though, that it's time that the problems with stops are being dealt with properly, as the problem keeps coming up time after time.
And as I see it, there's nothing "off base" about getting a little suspicious then, nor with expressing that suspicion on the board. As for the way I formulated that suspicion, well I might have phrased it differently, but then again, communication on a board is to some extent informal, and I would not like to be on a board where it is forbidden to express frustration and irritation from time to time. So I won't edit that.
gottago