Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
I am a big an advocate of the First Amendment as anyone else, but I don't feel particularly threatened if the FCC plugs Howard Stern's toilet mouth or puts a lid on the other pollution being spewed by "shock jocks." As for TV, I look on it kind of like driving around in my neighborhood. I don't want a bunch of seedy strip clubs and porno shops there, and I don't see why the people, through their representatives, can't insist that some minimal standards be applied to TV land. We know the broadcasters can't be trusted to do the job themselves. Hell, they can't even report the news without trying to use it to promote some asshole's book trying to capitalize on 9/11.
I am very sensitive to the concern that future administrations might try to use a similar procedure to silence political speech they disagree with. In fact, that has been done in the past, using something known as the Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to air "both" sides of controversial issues. Obviously, it would make talk radio untenable, and many would like to see that happen. Since we have a congress and a Supreme Court who think it is perfectly appropriate to ban political ads before an election, I don't have much faith that they would do much if anything to protect political speech over the air.
At worst however, that is a speculative threat, while our airwaves are being inundated in pollution now. Let's clean up the mess and worry about political speech when the time comes.