Stop Orders: Creating Liquidity Against Yourself?!

I learned only after losses of course, if the stop is within 20% of the stock, never ever have it in before the open, how many times have you been stopped out at lows for the day, week or month cause you became your own worst enemy? Waiting five minutes to let market settle down if it gapped down and then stop is placed below the five minute low, this little more risk than being out and cursing watching the market reverse.
 
I have a procedure that I use and teach for the determination of both stop-loss and profit target levels. The procedure is based upon that particular spread combination's historical trading range.

I demand that my clients set and enter GTC limit orders for both the stop-loss and the profit target at the time of trade entry. It may seem a bit trite and old-school, but it has been working quite well. I have a responsibility to my clients to do my best by them, and to keep them alive.

The holy grail is that there is no holy grail. But the closest universal skill for a successful trader is sound position management. And I find that traders using trade-by-trade discretion can have problems. We are in the business of calculated risk.

Just my 2 cents, YMMV.
 
Market conditions may hinder a stop order from being executed exactly where you place it. That is why you should consult with your broker on their written policies and details of how they execute stop orders.
 
The greater size of the Forex market gives it greater liquidity due to the numerous traders that are trading at any given time.
 
Market conditions may hinder a stop order from being executed exactly where you place it. That is why you should consult with your broker on their written policies and details of how they execute stop orders.
Don't need to consult broker, slippage is normal to a certain degree.
 
If you are participating in a really thin, volatile market like Cotton or Gasoline or certain metals futures, you are going to have to specify an aggressive stop limit range - that's the nature of those markets. If a wide stop limit range is unappealing to you, then consider liquid product names or exchange supported spreads.
 
Don't need to consult broker, slippage is normal to a certain degree.
I agree, that is why,unlike a market order, traders are advised to use limit orders as well. A limit order only fills at the price you want, or better.
 
Lately I've been hesitant to put stop orders in against my positions, and I'm curious as to what you think of my reasoning.

Example: Imagine being long on Nasdaq:MU for 10000 shares, BOT at $18.71. A GTC stop order is entered at $18.50.
  • What I really dislike is that you have created liquidity against your own position. Liquidity has value, and effect on the market. The appearance of this liquidity on the order book might have the effect of drawing the price down.
  • If you don your tinfoil hat for a moment, you might believe that the broker's algobots have funding at their disposal to move the price. Said bots sell to move the price down 21 cents, touch your stop order, grab the commissions, and then cover.
  • Furthermore, just how effective is a stop order? In the case of a downspike, when the stop price is breached, the stop order becomes a market order, and it may be filled well below the entered stop price.

Point number three has cost people a lot of money. Google "flash crash" of 2010 I think. A stop loss does not guarantee you will get out at the stop loss price, it does guarantee you will loose money in a crash. Better to use good portfolio allocation and keep your eye on the ball. SMS alerts can help.

Does anyone know, if you put in a limit order to sell a stock, does the limit just get converted to a market order when the price is right, or are you guaranteed to get the limit price or nothing?
 
If a broker traded against your hidden stop that way, they would be guilty of a crime.

Mechanical stop's are tricky at best. You could just as easily be tagged at the extreme of the move, as get out at a better price. Nothing easy about trading.


Oh no! A broker guilty of a crime! Never have I heard of such a thing! (Just teasing)
 
Back
Top