Braddock notion to not use stops is a contested one on this forum but I will say as you are a newbie ALWAYS USE A STOP. I always initiate trades with a stop in mind. Sometimes I put a stop loss order in place on shorter term trades and others I set a mental stop on longer term trades. But I Always have an out of where I know I am wrong. Until you develop that skill and to help you develop the skill of stop placement you should always set them. If they are always getting triggered and trade goes your way after its triggered you learned you placed them too close. But at least you didn't lose you account while learning this. Stops are essential early in ones trading career.
This is overall bad advice because if you condition yourself to use stops inappropriately, as is the case for most short term traders, your stops can be triggered by a whipsaw or intraday noise causing you to take a loss unnecessarily. Unless you're planning to buy and hold, a strategy that something like CLNE is NOT suited for (although you could make a case for short and hold) then using a stop is just a bad idea.
Braddock also says you should short CLNE because of the type of company it is. As a technician I could care less what the company does. I only care about what the charts say.
Once again, bad advice. Charts don't tell you everything. You cannot ignore one element because you decided you wanted to fixate on the other so you could label yourself a "technical" trader...if the underlying stock is prone to decline, as the charts you posted clearly show, then that is something to take into consideration. Lotto expectations of some massive reversal are not sound strategy, and so green energy stocks which engage in a fraudulent scheme to manipulate legitimate energy prices and fuel costs will never be profitable...thus a perma-short.
Fundamental analysis is looking at that info. Some people use TA and fundamentals to trade but I don't. One could also make the fundamental argument that CLNE is a buy with all the green energy stuff Obama and Democrats support. The price of oil has risen lately and as that goes up CLNE will benefit. The chart clearly shows massive high volume buying in CLNE over the last several weeks. Seems like many people agree with the OP and not Braddock. Well I do too.
No, one could not make the argument that a democrat scam is worth buying any more than it's worth "investing" in a ponzi scam. Oil prices could revert back to $80/bbl and fuels would still be a far better, more reliable form of energy any of the green energy junk.
Most people are idiots, and therefore will not understand why I am right. And since I'm not getting paid to post, I have little incentive to dumb things down for the average mouth-breather to understand why the entire "green energy" industry is a total farce that should never be bought into (unless your goal is to lose money).