Except if the "lady' is a feminist, she might be put off. Although, the extra garlic might be enough to put her off regardless.
arf arf!
arf arf!
Quote from hii a_ooiioo_a:
Perhaps you have your Elite Trader account options set to "hide signatures" and have not seen my signature on my posts. It is more like the flip of a coin than not....It's rollercoaster/seesaw time on the stock market. So take advantage of it if you can.
Quote from rlb21079:
I see your point about randomness but I must respectfully disagree. I can also see your quote below each of your posts.
I agree with taking advantage of what is now. I had been uner-emphasizing this in favor of looking ahead. It is important first to know what is, probably more important than knowing what is going to be.
And, as will be shown in my next post I am full-bore short at the moment. So, atleast to some degree, my thoughts about the market advancing higher are being put on the back-burner.
Quote from iceman1:
so what happened to your conviction of only trading from the "long side"... do you find something "funny" about posting a detailed and specific plan with apparent confidence, and then within 48 hours diametrically changing it?! Seems a bit.... uh... flimsy, uncertain, etc.
However... what then WAS the purpose of posting it in the first place?!!
Quote from rlb21079:
My conviction of going long still exists, but I have realized my timing was (is, might be?) wrong. Thus, I have adapted for the time being. I apologize for the apparent confidence, I was writing what I felt at the time. I see no purpose in sticking to what I say merely for the reason that I have said it, opinions change often and I'd like not to be an individual who sets their mind in stone. Uncertain? To a degree. One should never be so certain that they are unwilling to change.
The purpose of this thread is to exemplify the openess which I have encouraged in "Organized Systems Sharing." It would be hypocritical of me to suggest the sharing of one's system and then myself not share. I am, of course, not encouraging all to share as openly as I do in this thread. Rather, I am taking my suggestion further than I ask. That is, I am sharing more than what is required for Stone Kettle Soup (the working title sprung from the Organized Systems Sharing thread).
I hope I've addressed your inquiry to your satisfaction.
-rlb
Quote from rlb21079:
ADSK Long @ 16.81 (Carryover)
ADSK Sell Stop @ 16.30 (Carryover)
----Sell Stop filled @ 16.29----
P/L = -0.52
ADSK Buy Stop/Lmt @ 17.50/18.00
DSPG Short @ 19.41 (Carryover)
DSPG Short @ 18.41 (2x Original Position)
Avg Cost = 18.91 (Close: 18.41)
DSPG Cover Stop @ 20.01 --changed-- @ 18.75
I am now 100% short, with as many shares as had previously been split short/long. The stop for DSPG has been drawn pretty tight. I have less confidence on the short side than the long, especially since DSPG has approached its old resistance. However, I feel I can afford to take the additional risk of doubling my position with a stop that is better than break-even. Basically, If I am wrong, or if DSPG's behaviour gets erratic I want out. If the market breaks down I want to win "big." Chances are I'll get stopped out and make nothing, but if not I stand to do pretty well.
The new Buy Stop set for ADSK is in case it breaks up when I'm not looking. My job prevents me from keeping a close eye, and since my long-term outlook is still long I wouldn't want to miss a big move by being pre-occupied with my short trade of DSPG. The level of the stop (17.50) I think is cushy enough not to be stuck with an undesired trade. Should I begin to suspect an upcoming advance I will move the stop closer to market value.
Quote from iceman1:
noticed you did not post intial targets for DSPG short... there is support at or near 17
What is the basis for your short... TA or otherwise?
Regards,
Ice![]()