Shouldn't we stipulate that "stockbrokers" are no different than "traders" in that some are terrible, lose money, and quit while others work hard, are successful, make a lot of money over a career. Some "stockbrokers" (although they are now called Financial Advisor's) are terrible, have know idea what they are doing, lose money for their clients, and quit to find another job while others are very sharp guys, successful, consistently make money for their clients and a heck of a nice living for themselves as a result. My cousin is a "Financial Advisor" with Merrill and a very sharp guy when in comes to investments, stocks, etc., and yes-even trading. He has a book of business managing about $500 million with a return on assets of about .5%=$2.5 mm gross X a 40% payout =$1,000,000 take home. Not bad. His clients range from hedge funds to foundations and endowments to high net worth families all of whom I doubt would stay with him if he was a total boob. He of course is in the minority, but I also know many others that fit the same bill but on a smaller scale. I'm just sayin...