Dark, Sorry for the late reply I took off to the beach yesterday afternoon
Originally posted by darkhorse
The adapting and consistent changing intrigues me because it's the opposite of the way I've tried to go. From the beginning I've strived to build a methodology that is consistent through all moods thick and thin and does not require tweaking or interpretation. Doesn't that burn you out not to have a bedrock/core methodology that lasts?
For me Dark staying fluid has been key... The only constant in my trading is me... My external methods change like the wind... My core over the years has been my money and risk management, my understanding of market dynamics, and my mind set... As for actual set-ups that I pull out of my arsenal they change with the markets...
[/QUOTE] [/B]I'm also surprised at the 2 or 3 to 1 r:r's and the lower than 40% hit rates, those are standard type numbers for position traders but very rare for short termers in my estimation. Care to share your typical holding time? [/B][/QUOTE]
For me I was never too interested in the probabilities BUT the odds... I would opt for the lumpy short-term curve but bigger increase in the macro frame anyday, as long of course that I could control the drawdowns... As for holding time, I was basicly doing 90% multi-session trading for most of my career, last summer is when I started concentrating more on intraday plays... After that it was a mix between the two and now it is pure intraday on the NQ...
[/QUOTE] [/B]The how much risk per trade is definitely a personal thing, if I were ballsy I would put more on the table, but I have a strangely passionate distaste for double digit drawdowns, no matter how rare or infrequent. [/B][/QUOTE]
I am with you on this one... I was always focused more on staying in this beautiful game than making 1,000% a year... Over the years though I have been able to keep the +10% DD's to a bear minimum...And is it a lack of balls or wisdom that keeps you from putting too much on the tabel?
PEACE and good trading,
Commisso