Volume has already declined.Quote from Daal:
Truth or exaggeration?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aUFMGaqiHYaA&pos=15
Empty pockets (from recessions) decrease volume faster than taxes or regulations.
Volume has already declined.Quote from Daal:
Truth or exaggeration?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aUFMGaqiHYaA&pos=15
Quote from shfly:
Sweden did in the 1980's
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=150546&perpage=6&pagenumber=883
Quote from FerdinandAlx:
I don't see how this would curb speculation. If you think oil's going to double from current prices would you mind paying a .25% transaction cost on your oil stock or a .02% tax on the future? I wouldn't.
The only thing that's going to be curbed is high volume, short term trading. From the revenue side this would collapse income from capital gains taxes and other types of taxable income due to decreasing volumes. Dumb dumb dumb...
Quote from flytiger:
It's populist kickback for all the graft that was allowed to happen. I think cooler heads will prevail, but there will be some other onerous thing rear its ugly head.
They never think of the consequences, just how it plays in Peoria.
Quote from psytrade:
Is the tax only on profitable trades or all trades?
Either way you'll see people trying tax arbitrage strategies - putting the losing end of the trade in the US, while profiting offshore.
Mind you they already do that with most trades with the bigger companies...