Threei, I believe you to be a very intelligent person. I believe that I am a reasonably effective communicator. Therefore, for you to keep introducing non sequiturs such as this;
"You don't want chat room operator to consider these factors too for each trader, do you? "
and other failures to connect in this thread really makes me wonder.
"8 private messages and e-mails I got today confirm my take: it's just about different opinions. 6 of them are in favor of my point of view and 2 are against"
Alas, people hardly ever write to me. Chartwiz used to, but then he finally quit the board and doesn't any more. However, I have an interesting theory on this. I wonder how many of your positive respondents were chatroom customers.
I have noticed in this and similar threads that active chatroom customers tend to leap to the defence of their gurus. I wonder if we have the trading room version of the "Stockholm Syndrome" at work here.
For those too young to remember, terrorists used to take people hostage and make demands, rather than blow things up. It was very common for the hostages to identify with their captors. In the case of young women, they sometimes had sex with and even fell in love with them. One famous case resulted in this being known as the Stockholm Syndrome.
I wonder if those who put up large monthly fees to become part of a chatroom community feel compelled to defend their gurus because it psychologically re-inforces their need to believe that they are not wasting their money, in a similar way to captives identifying with their captors because it psychologically made them feel they had a better chance of surviving.
8 people wrote to you, a trading guru and celebrity, but nobody wrote to me. Seems indicative of some need to identify with the guru.
Just musing out loud, not really trying to start a debate on what is almost certainly unprovable.
"You don't want chat room operator to consider these factors too for each trader, do you? "
and other failures to connect in this thread really makes me wonder.
"8 private messages and e-mails I got today confirm my take: it's just about different opinions. 6 of them are in favor of my point of view and 2 are against"
Alas, people hardly ever write to me. Chartwiz used to, but then he finally quit the board and doesn't any more. However, I have an interesting theory on this. I wonder how many of your positive respondents were chatroom customers.
I have noticed in this and similar threads that active chatroom customers tend to leap to the defence of their gurus. I wonder if we have the trading room version of the "Stockholm Syndrome" at work here.
For those too young to remember, terrorists used to take people hostage and make demands, rather than blow things up. It was very common for the hostages to identify with their captors. In the case of young women, they sometimes had sex with and even fell in love with them. One famous case resulted in this being known as the Stockholm Syndrome.
I wonder if those who put up large monthly fees to become part of a chatroom community feel compelled to defend their gurus because it psychologically re-inforces their need to believe that they are not wasting their money, in a similar way to captives identifying with their captors because it psychologically made them feel they had a better chance of surviving.
8 people wrote to you, a trading guru and celebrity, but nobody wrote to me. Seems indicative of some need to identify with the guru.
Just musing out loud, not really trying to start a debate on what is almost certainly unprovable.
