Stock Model

I am really busy trendlover I barely have time for anything.

I will check on TSLA later and let you know.


Quote from trendlover:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nitro, you are very quiet on the ET. So what do you think of TSLA now? And look at this link too.



"After Romney reiterated that he was in favor of government support of industry research, he turned to Tesla, Fisker, and also failed solar-panel maker Solyndra.

According to the complete debate transcript, he said:

I have the kind of commitment to make sure that our industries in this country can compete and be successful. We in this country can compete successfully with anyone in the world. And we’re going to.

We’re going to have to have a president, however, that doesn’t think that somehow the government investing in — in car companies like Tesla and — and Fisker, making electric battery cars — this is not research, Mr. President.

These are the government investing in companies, investing in Solyndra. This is a company. This isn’t basic research. I — I want to invest in research. Research is great. Providing funding to universities and think tanks — great.

But investing in companies? Absolutely not. That’s the wrong way to go.

Technically, the U.S. government has not "invested" in any of the named companies. It does not have an ownership share--unlike its equity holding in General Motors and, previously, Chrysler.

Instead, both car companies received low-interest loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy under its Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing program, launched in 2008 under the administration of President George W. Bush.



Barack Obama

Romney followed his criticism of Tesla and Fisker by reiterating that he "wanted to make America more competitive" and "do those things that make America the most attractive place in the world for entrepreneurs, innovators, businesses to grow."

He then said to Obama, "But your investing in companies doesn’t do that. In fact it makes it less likely for them to come here."

President Barack Obama did not respond specifically to the criticism of Tesla and Fisker.

Predictably, electric-car advocates reacted adversely to Romney's words.

"What I don't get is why, with all of the crazy things our taxpayer dollars get spent on, Romney keeps beating the Tesla drum," observed Tom Saxton of Plug-In America on Facebook.

In attacking Tesla, he said, the governor is "beating down a company that's developing new technology, creating American jobs, reinvigorating the American auto industry, and maybe leading us to an opportunity not to be so totally dependent on the world oil market."

"What I find interesting is he's alienated a lot of Republican who support electric cars--and, yes, there are quite a few of them," commented electric-car advocate and Montclair, New Jersey, restauranteur Tom Moloughney.

"I personally know at least 10 people who are Republicans, who didn't vote for Obama in the last election, but are going to in this one because of Romney's stance on the issue."

Neither Tesla nor Fisker arose during the second presidential debate, and Fisker was only indirectly cited in the Ryan-Biden vice-presidential debate.

+++++++++++
http://www.greencarreports.com/news...sla-fisker-again-in-final-presidential-debate


And this too nitro. I will tell you my grandfather's opinion is he very sure of this to be the future of the cars. And he say USA will make this go forward.
 
Quote from nitro:

I am really busy trendlover I barely have time for anything.

I will check on TSLA later and let you know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok nitro. To your health!
 
Quote from nitro:

I have an equity model. I will post some ideas in this thread. It will be ranked between -7 to +7. -7 means strong sell(*), +7 means strong buy. Zero means no bias. I get intersted in anything <= - 4 and anything >= +4.

IF YOU HAVE A STOCK YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE RANKED, ASK AND I WILL RUN IT THROUGH THE MODEL


(*) Sometimes the strong sells are the best long, especially on huge up days because they cause short squeezes of titanic proportions. So if you really want to go long on a day that looks strong, either don't sell these, or even buy them if they are showing relative strength on that day.

I am curious to see rating for the following:

GNRC, DWRE. BCEI, OCN, EXP
 
Quote from stock777:

what happ to the other thread with 15000 posts and 5 million dollar drawdown?

He's learn't that the market can be predicted with a "Clifford" algebra since then!
 
Quote from trendlover:

Yes, appears to be. Nothing is absolute, but I like this one for 2 years play, or maybe more. :)
Right nothing absolute. If there is anything to be learned from this thread, is that one should mix good stocks long with bad stocks short. CAT will pretty much do what the SPX/DJX does, and since the indeces are in nosebleed area with completely artificial reasons for being here, it makes even more sense to hedge CAT with something correlated that sucks.

IMO.
 
Quote from Eddie Z:

I am curious to see rating for the following:

GNRC, DWRE. BCEI, OCN, EXP
Sorry I just noticed this request. Will do so tonight.
 
Back
Top