Stock Model

Quote from nitro:

I have an equity model. I will post some ideas in this thread. It will be ranked between -7 to +7. -7 means strong sell(*), +7 means strong buy. Zero means no bias. I get intersted in anything <= - 4 and anything >= +4.

IF YOU HAVE A STOCK YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE RANKED, ASK AND I WILL RUN IT THROUGH THE MODEL


(*) Sometimes the strong sells are the best long, especially on huge up days because they cause short squeezes of titanic proportions. So if you really want to go long on a day that looks strong, either don't sell these, or even buy them if they are showing relative strength on that day.

Allright, here's (3): GLNG, MAKO, DPZ
 
Quote from nitro:

I will run the model later on these stocks and post results:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/44027247


FSLR,-2
AN, -3
GME, 2
JCP, -2
SHLD, -4
SVU, 2
NFLX, -6
AMD, 2
DO, 2
LEN, -4
FII, -1
VMC, -3
URBN, -3
X, 0
AKS, 1
WPO, 3
MWW, 0
RRD, -1
CEPH, 3
NVLS, 2

I would be looking at CEPH and WPO as mild contrarian plays. On quiet down days I would look to sell SHLD, LEN and NFLX, and on huge up days I might be inclined to buy them instead.
 
Warren Buffet's portfolio:

AXP, 2
BK, 2
CDCO.OB, -3
COP, 2
COST, -3
GCI, 2
GE, 0
GSK, -2
IR, -2
JNJ, -1
KFT, 1
KO, 0
MCO, 1
MTB, 2
PG, 0
SNY, 0
TMK, 2
UPS, -2
USB, 2
USG, -3
WFC, 2
WMT, 1
WPO, 3
WSC, -1
XOM, 1

Interesting that WPO is in the "the most shorted list" above.
 
Someone asked for Cramer's portfolio. I hope this is an accurate list.

ORCL, -3
UPS, -2
PRU, 2
KSS, 2
HOT, 0
UN, 1
SYK, -1
USB, 3
AAPL, -3
PNRA, -3
ISRG, -4
HOG, -4
PNC, 3
JCI, -2
SNY, 0
ESV, 0
VIA-B, -4
UN, 1
JNPR, -2
IBM, -3
HES, 3
FCX, 1
FLR, -4
ESRX, -4
EMC, -2
DD, -2
DE, -1
CMI, 0
COST, -3
KO, 0
CAT, -2
BAC, 1
T, 5
APA, 2
AXP, 2
AA, -1
ACN, -2
 
Extremely popular stocks:

AAPL, -3
BIDU, -4
SLW, -6
MCD, -3
MRO, 3
DE, -2
NVO, -1
ARMH, -4
ABV, -2
MO, -2
PCLN, -4
FFIV, -4
ILMN, -6
CPL, 2
 
Some dividend stocks:

DBD, 0
AWR, 1
DOV, 0
NWN, 0
EMR, -1
GPC, -1
PG, 0
MMM, -1
VVC, 1
CINF, 0

Not surprisingly, these things are edgeless and are played for the dividend and not for the underlying movement.
 
Back
Top