S
SPX Blaster
In decimals the length of a lunar month is 29.53059...
Without delving deep (which I have zero interest in pioneering), I disagree.
An exact time is finite, a time unit is finite, and location degrees are finite. Those inputs being finite, it doesn't make sense (to me) that an exact match would/could not occur. I suppose it depends how far down the rabbit hole one wants to travels. The rotational wobble of astro bodies, maybe the wind speed in outer space. I'll leave the discussion stand right there.
Keep up the good work. Usable esoterics are an edge for trading!!
According to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi),
For 1957-01-01 through 2056-12-31, at 20:00 UTC each day, observing from New York, NY ( 73°59'39.1''W, 40°45'06.1''N ), the Moon was/will be 100.000 percent illuminated (precise to 0.001 percent) only on 1969-09-25, 1979-03-13, and 2023-10-28.
So for this precision of location, time, and illumination, the Moon can be completely full. Surprisingly, the only day the Moon was/will be 0.000 percent illuminated for the same location, date range, and time is 2052-03-30.
Last edited:
NO, DUDE...
*sighs* The market started dropping on May 5th because of Trump's new tariffs on China. It had nothing to do with a lunar cycle.
Unless you are suggesting that your lunar cycles can predict a new tariff thing in this trade war?
You are curve-fitting your cycles to fit the narrative.
S
SPX Blaster
Idiot poster I just blocked must have believed I manipulated the time stamp on my link to another forum where I called for the stock decline this past May on Mar. 13.
How the fuck do you know a lunar effect WASN'T (partially or solely) responsible for the timing of Trumps decision? And/Or anything else that happened IN THE WORLD that fed into the financial markets?
Go back to your silly game of pretending that everything is due to ONE MAN. You still holding that handful of micro indexes, several hundred points underwater? How the hell do you allow that to happen? And more than once?? The Hope and Pray for Breakeven trade method and plan.
Hey, @spx Blasters' work is predicting a possible way to get out. Maybe you've identified the wrong ONE MAN responsible for your trading.
To the OP: sorry for this callout in YOUR thread, but @Overnight needs it.
S
SPX Blaster
Look at it this way. Using number decimals to determine the mathematical number of 1/3, where does it end? It doesn't, it goes on to infinity. 1/3 cannot be determined "exactly" numerically.
S
SPX Blaster
He probably didn't see your post due to me blocking him. Feel free to copy your post to another thread that he still has the privilege of viewing. Actually, the cycle I shown on that thread was the 32 calendar year cycle. It is the 32 year calendar cycle that is the basis of what I started this thread about.
Because it ISN'T. If lunar cycles were responsible for any moves in the market with predictable outcomes, it would be all over the financial news sites. It just...ISN'T.
Trading by the moon is not a reliable predictor of future results. Nothing is, to be honest. Only the fundamentals underlying the market you are trying to trade.
You seem to think that I am blaming Trump for a thing. I am kinda' not. I am saying that he is the cause of a thing. So in that sense, he is to blame for the thing. He is the direct cause of the immediate and near-term effect of the thing.
And the fundamentals are effected by his thing.