Stochastics

Quote from Goinglite:

Just need a min to post a chart for you.

Forgot to add the "circles".

Here's the chart. Nothing on it is "canned". Except, maybe the candles.

The alerts don't "flicker". They appear in "real time" just as they do "after the fact".

All in all, not a bad day.
 

Attachments

Nice one Going, considering there's a lot hidden. I like the first BUY signal - cavedwellers will think the stoch signalled a sell.

Luv it!
 
Quote from yoohoo:

Nice one Going, considering there's a lot hidden. I like the first BUY signal - cavedwellers will think the stoch signalled a sell.

Luv it!

Those are not Stoch's :) The only setup that actually needed an oscillator to be ob/os was the "Top".
 
Sorry guys - my squiggly line thingy that's after the event and doesn't tell me to take the wick way before the PA signal.

Imagine how this looks in a much smaller timeframe. That's why we combine indicators to lead PA.

Did I say lead PA? What am I thinking of? Noting can lead PA (bowing down in the "I'm not worthy" position).

Must get my mantra right. Nothing leads PA... nothing leads PA...
 

Attachments

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

I can guarantee you no one is going to sharing their complete techniques on this board.


Why not? I've always wondered about this. There may be many et readers, but not enough to stop any system from working in your lifetime.
 
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

I can guarantee you no one is going to sharing their complete techniques on this board

I would have to agree with you on this one

regards
f9
 
Chattering like a drunken monkey riding a paint shaker, little jimmy pounded out the following delusional non-sequitur on his rent-a-center e-machine…………


Quote from MandelbrotSet:

The thing is, instead of starting a thread showing people how to use price action as the sole tool for making trading decisions, stealth trader choose to put a lot of work into coming here and insisiting that we're all wrong ... :D :) , wonder if he's just a voyuer in his life outside of ET also. :eek:


That's an astute observation, little jimmy. How about you back it up with a single time when I “insisted you were all wrong” as you so boldly claim. You are free to use the search function to peruse my posts. When you find one, I invite you to quote it.

Here’s a quote from you, and I quote, "You are correct in saying that most indicators are not very usefull"

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=121269&perpage=6&pagenumber=2


And for the record, you feeble minded pipsqueak (no offense intended, but nonetheless accurate), :D I not only shared my trading technique here on ET, but have spent countless hours in dozens of PM’s replying to anyone that had a question.

Given the fact all you do is continuously jump from thread to thread in pure lunatic fashion posting pilfered quotes and charts derived from other trader’s contributions, and that you provide absolutely nothing original of your own accord speaks volumes as to where you are on the paper trading ladder. And let’s not overlook the fact you do this under various aliases as to keep your post counts down. Obviously you don’t want anyone to realize just how much you post during trading hours while pretending to be scalping profit after profit from “losers” like myself. Sorry ass-clown, we noticed! :D :D :D


st
 
The squiggly line proponents are defending their coveted lagging indicators in the same manner as those college academia exercises where they try to prove that real isn't real, never mind the obvious.

For those in the bleachers, note that no one has been able to answer the question of what indicators give that price can not. Speaks volumes.

Nonethless, it does seem I have hit a nerve! :D


st
 
Quote from Goinglite:

Wow :) Some amazing comments towards someone you know absolutely nothing about.

Sheesh, of all people, Yoohoo, LOL :)

I know that Yoohoo is the real deal. But of course, I "could" be telling a "lie" :)

Maybe, in time, you will get a chance to "prove" your point :)



You show too much class to be a liar. Of course, you could be "mistaken." :D

st
 
Back
Top