Still Standing: The Building That Proves WTC 7 Was Imploded

A

AMT4SWA

Still Standing: The Building That Proves WTC 7 Was Imploded

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, February 10, 2009

New videos of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel fire in Beijing highlight the vivid contrast between the damage it suffered as it was completely consumed by roaring flames, yet remained standing, and the comparative sporadic fires across just 8 floors that led to the complete free fall collapse of WTC 7.

Article and Videos.............. http://www.infowars.com/still-standing-the-building-that-proves-wtc-7-was-imploded/
 
Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, February 9, 2009

Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one?

Article and Videos.......... http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse/
 
Beijing skyscraper.

090209top1a.jpg


090209top2.jpg



WTC 7

090209top3.jpg


090209top5.jpg




There is no way in hell, WTC 7 could collapse at the speed of gravity in a perfect, choreographed failure.

Every girding, every steel beam and all the load-bearing steel columns - most of which WERN'T EVEN DAMAGED - just buckled at exactly the right moment to enable a perfect, foot print collapse of WTC 7?!!

Talk about DELUSIONAL

Even a structure that fails in one section, would bring parts or the whole structure down in a very chunky, staggered way, as the remaining structure is still intact, and capable of supporting itself. That means those intact structures would RESIST and HOLD UP those failed sections. That means a quiet, gravity-speed collapse into its own foot print IS IMPOSSIBLE>

Just think about it. There's no Goddamed way one tiny failure - assuming there was even one! - could make every joint, joyce and column 400 ft AWAY in a totally different section gracefully fail in a seamless collapse.

No way. The entire NIST report is tautological by its very nature.

Engineering science has never seen this type of systemic collapse before to such scant damage in over-engineered buildings. So they fit facts around the theory, that the building must have collapsed from natural causes!!
 
And the number one DIFFERENCE between the Beijing building fire and WTC 7 collapse............they WILL NOT FIND "NANO-THERMITE" is all the dust/rubble samples in Beijing!!! :eek:

WTC 7......controlled DEMOLITION.......CASE CLOSED! :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top