Quote from Trend Fader:
This comment makes no sense. There are 10,000 stocks in the US.. every investor has their own style and habits. How can too many people jump on board 10,000 different stocks and make trading with an edge collapse.
Your scenerio is a hypthetical that will never occur... what is even the point of making dumb comments like that.
10,000 stocks, 70% of which are untradeable so let's be realistic. Have a look through some of these stocks, I know I have a few times when I make my stock filters.
Use some common sense, if everyone starts cutting losses quick while attemtping to catch those few big wins, the stocks simply chop most out. Yes, this happens to swing traders too, who do you think the specialists were shaking before the 1990s? Ever hear of running the stops? How about the short squeezes on garbage stocks like MYG, remember that squeeze a month or two ago? These moves are made for swing traders cause too many ppl on the right side. Stocks chop & whipsaw on all time scales, hunting for stops and shaking weak hands.
The ultimate winners are the clearing firms & B/Ds, it has been like this forever. Your goal as a trader is to use discretion in order to shift your bets & risk toward the proper trades. That requires accepting higher risk for some trades and hence the standard small losses will not hold up. You'll simply miss out on the right trades or you will accumulate too many small losses where you will bleed to death after commissions & slippage. People act like a few big wins will save you from the numerous small losses, sorry but the wins can't get that big with everyone so quick to take profits nowdays. You have to get out sometime, so where do you close the position? Hold indefinitely? We all know how the buy & hold & invest public performs.
Steve Cohen's real edge is top grade first call information, the other stuff is secondary. Didn't we discuss this like a year ago? The early bird gets the worm, so wake up, the top players use tricks that are unavailable to the rest, it's been like this for centuries so why the hell would it change now? They play big, they take risk and they do not mess around.
Once again, I'm not saying to not cut losses but my point is that the overused "small losses, big wins" idiom is misleading. Why do futures & stocks chop and whipsaw so much? Cause it's all traders so quick to take small losses churning each other to death. If you want the reward, you have to take the risk, otherwise you just sit there collecting losses 90% of the time and hoping that the 10% of wins are enough to cover your losses & commish.