Step by Step How HFT's will SCREW YOU on the payroll number

Quote from johnnyqpublic:

You are either misinformed or a troll.


Yet another well informed good argument by the HFT nerds. When you ask question after question and all you receive is no answers and abuse, then that is as sure a sign of guilt as any.

johnnyqpublic ... another one to add to the HFT Offenders list.
Do not let him move into your neighbourhood, if you see him lurking near any normal prop firms with a long anorak and his hands DEEP in his pockets please inform the police. :D
 
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:

if you see him lurking near any normal prop firms with a long anorak and his hands DEEP in his pockets please inform the police. :D

You sure you're not stock777's cousin?
 
Quote from johnnyqpublic:

You sure you're not stock777's cousin?

Sorry I'm too buzy stuffing the bid side order book, so when the market moves up fast everyone short will experience severe slowdowns and will then have to pay up to get out of their shorts.
I'm long from the open and the HFT bid side manipulation here is working a treat. LONG LIVE THE NERDBOX!!!!
 
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:

Sorry I'm too buzy stuffing the bid side order book, so when the market moves up fast everyone short will experience severe slowdowns and will then have to pay up to get out of their shorts.
I'm long from the open and the HFT bid side manipulation here is working a treat. LONG LIVE THE NERDBOX!!!!

It's weird, I've never experienced the slowdowns you describe. I'm using thinkorswim on a crappy DSL line.

ping -c 5 google.com
PING google.com (173.194.35.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=162 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=297 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=291 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=250 time=194 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=250 time=113 ms
 
Quote from johnnyqpublic:

It's weird, I've never experienced the slowdowns you describe. I'm using thinkorswim on a crappy DSL line.

ping -c 5 google.com
PING google.com (173.194.35.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=162 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=297 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=291 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=250 time=194 ms
64 bytes from lga15s16-in-f104.1e100.net (173.194.35.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=250 time=113 ms


It depends what you view as slow.

By the looks of things you are trading on average at twice as slow a speed as me. Trust me if your are trading at over 200ms, you are miles behind. It may not look to the eye like it is slow, but i can assure you that you a turtle and not one of Richard Dennis's trutles either :p
 
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:

It depends what you view as slow.

By the looks of things you are trading on average at twice as slow a speed as me. Trust me if your are trading at over 200ms, you are miles behind. It may not look to the eye like it is slow, but i can assure you that you a turtle and not one of Richard Dennis's trutles either :p

I've never claimed to be anything. As I recall, you'd added me to some HFT something or other list. I reiterate however that I see no slowdown, no inability to trade, even after news comes out. My trades still execute. If I lose money, it's because the market went up and I was selling.
 
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:I'm lying am I? So I take you haven't heard of propriety trading firms, where you have numerous traders sharing a big line. I'm in an office with up to 50 traders at a time. Am I still lying?
No that’s not really intentional lying – but you are grossly misinformed and misrepresenting yourself – it’s also obvious that you don’t really understand networking or how bandwidth works.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:Promagma, I don't trade on the internet. I trade on a 100MB dedicated line. I presume this would be enough to cover all market events…
You aren’t really on a 100mbit line, you SHARE a 100mbit line and you have no clue how your network admin set up the priorities on your switches so you could be throttled back to 1mbit/sec and have the lowest priority for all you know – you are just guessing and throwing out numbers that don’t make sense at this point.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt: I'm in an office with up to 50 traders at a time.
50 guys on one 100mbit line (which I would guess is burst not symmetrical (would you like to test that for us?) is WAY TOO SMALL of a pipe. Unless you are all manually trading and only scanning a few securities – you would need closer to 300-500mbit line (symmetrical not burst) to handle 50 traders.
In your Task Manager, go to Networking and tell us how much bandwidth you use at peak times. Multiply that by 50 and see where your firm is at, remember that quote servers will probably pull closer to 35mbit/sec sustained but we’ll leave that out for now and stick with the basics to prove my point.



Quote from Joovenile Jatt: there is no difference
Actually there is. There is no NBBO like stocks, there is no sub-pennying, there is no market makers, etc. You are grossly mistaken if you think there is zero difference between stocks and futures.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:if you traded the number on Friday
I did and it was fine, in the equity space I saw nothing unusual outside of wider than average spreads and lower than average volume – but I assumed that was due to the holiday
Quote from Joovenile Jatt: Extreme bil side order stuffing engineered to slow systems down and front run them... EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. I talked to 3 people at 3 other trading firms and they experienced the exact same thing and resulting slowdowns.
Sounds to me like your prop firm needs to update their hardware or you need to update your desktop. Are you running quote servers off P4 machines? Is your desktop a Pentium4? What you are describing as Quote Stuffing is just a spike in market activity, which usually happens around economic numbers. Just because your systems aren’t able to handle that does not mean someone is out to get the whole market – it simply means you are using old technology that needs updating. It also sounds like your three buddies need to get their backers to update their boxes as well.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt: With due respect to the people who are trading on the internet here, I think we have a different version of what is slow. I trade at circa 85 milliseconds. You can't get that on any internet line in the world and I can assure you that 85 milliseconds is MILES TOO SLOW. These HFT's nerds are getting it down to 10 milliseconds.
What? Nerds maybe… but 10ms is an eternity as is 85ms. If you are sitting at your prop firm (in Chicago I presume if you are trading futures) then you should be able to get a fill confirm back in < 45ms if trading manually. Internalization and matching engines are in the nanosecond space, 10ms is a good execute for a remote box or even a manual trader, 10ms execute for a matching engine or an internalization algo is a dinosaur. Again you are grossly misinformed and need to learn a few things.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:Which moves on to my other point. I don't mind that the HFT nerds have a 75 millisecond advantage over me. I don't mind if they can see able to scalp in front of size quicker than me, that's part of the game. I do mind however when they are using order stuffing to make that advantage 150 milliseconds and not 75 milliseconds. I do mind when they are getting illegal information from brokers or whoever so that when I am trying to buy my full size of 100 contracts at 1092 in the ES, they see that and buy the 1092 before me .. ie THEY JUMP IN FRONT. That is downright illegal insider trading
Are you sure your broker isn’t throttling you to take a look? Lots of them do it. You either have crappy hardware (your computer, lines, switches, etc.) or you are getting played, or both. The issue you are experiencing has nothing to do with what you describe as quote stuffing. Get a better system that can handle the data and you won’t have any delays.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:That is downright illegal insider trading
Quote Stuffing is different than front running and it seems that you don’t know the difference or you are lumping the two together. As I said previously, if someone is throttling you, or your quotes, and then taking a look at your orders before they go to market… then you are getting bent over by your broker, not by HFT (or your broker is using HFT to trade against you, which is really sad).
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:The HFT nerds here will try to twist it, attempt to make me look stupid, or just throw insults but they can NEVER give us an answer for why there is HUGE order stuffing by the HFT nerds when the market moves quickly ie during figures. They know I have outed them and exposed their illegal game in plain english.
I don’t insult people and I think you make yourself look stupid, not anyone’s reply. At an economic or energy number volume and interest picks up and more orders go to market, that is not quote stuffing its just a spike in volume. Your systems are old and antiquated or your broker is throttling you… It has nothing to do with anything outside your firm.
Quote from Joovenile Jatt: I AM A PREDOMINENTLY LONG SIDE TRADER AND THEY SPENT THE WHOLE TRADING SESSION MANIPULATING THE MARKET UP.
Well now that’s not always true either… lol
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:But does that make it right when experienced good screen traders are blowing out to their corruption? I say no.
Experienced good screen traders are blowing out because they are making bad calls/decisions and lose trading, not because HFT is taking their money. The ONLY hint of corruption **might** be from your broker who could be looking at your orders before they go to market. Outside that – yeah it seems like you are a sore loser. Sorry… someone’s gotta say it.
 
Quote from johnnyqpublic:

I've never claimed to be anything. As I recall, you'd added me to some HFT something or other list. I reiterate however that I see no slowdown, no inability to trade, even after news comes out. My trades still execute. If I lose money, it's because the market went up and I was selling.

That's even worse, your so behind everyone else and you don't even realise it. That's what HFT is all about. They want to rob you without yo noticing. The facts show you are miles behind, because you can't see it with your eye is irrelevant. Most don't realise how slow they are, we are talking milliseconds, the eye cannot see the millisecond differences.
 
Quote from Joovenile Jatt:

That's even worse, your so behind everyone else and you don't even realise it. That's what HFT is all about. They want to rob you without yo noticing. The facts show you are miles behind, because you can't see it with your eye is irrelevant. Most don't realise how slow they are, we are talking milliseconds, the eye cannot see the millisecond differences.

Actually, as Winston has noted, milliseconds are irrelevant as far as the fast game is concerned. But I'm not trying to play it. Are you? I'm not the guy moaning about how money is being stolen out from under my nose.

Please swallow your pride, read Winston's reply twice, and consider his words at face value.
 
I like Winston's reply, unfortunately though he is obviously an intelligent chap, he is somewhat misinformed about the market generally and totally misinformed about my situation. He lost a lot of credibility when he called me a sore loser. I'm long from the open today, I need to watch the market here, will answer his points when I have time
 
Back
Top