His idea is not a trading device. He couldn't patent his idea and make money off of it. Mr. Paulson trusted Mr. Greene as a friend, confident, and potential investor to disclose to him his business ideas. It would almost be the same thing as if Mr. Paulson presented a business plan for a new business (all the details of the plan laid out) and Mr. Greene took his business plan and started a new business out of it. However, trading ideas are much easier to steal. Thats why people sign Non-Disclosure agreements before reading business plans, so the people reading it, won't steal it.
It's obvious that he didn't want Jeff Greene to take his idea and use it, because he got mad about it.
Look at it at another angle. Suppose you invite me to dinner with you and your wife and you introduce me to her. I get friendly with her and start having sex with her behind your back? Would you get mad? Or would you swallow it up and say that she's free to have sex with anyone wants? It's a free world? The only one to have sex with her should be Dman666?
It's obvious that he didn't want Jeff Greene to take his idea and use it, because he got mad about it.
Look at it at another angle. Suppose you invite me to dinner with you and your wife and you introduce me to her. I get friendly with her and start having sex with her behind your back? Would you get mad? Or would you swallow it up and say that she's free to have sex with anyone wants? It's a free world? The only one to have sex with her should be Dman666?
Quote from dman666:
So Paulson created a "Trading Device" to take advantage of a situation he thought may happen and is now mad because Greene used this "Trading Device" and his directional bias to "Trade" that market?
So whoever trades an ETF should be considered stealing an idea because he is not the person who created that trading instrument? The only person that should be able to trade an ETF is the person who created it? How could we make a market doing this?
