So, the consistency between win% proves (or is the best indication) that the out-of-sample is still benefiting from the same pattern as the in-sample. And, that you didn't produce a positive or negative out of sample result by sheer luck. Correct?

I've been tinkering with it a little and I'm thinking perhaps the 200-day average is too slow and that perhaps I'll have to use the 50-day average or similar.
Then: If day close above 50-day average --> Up trend. And vice versa.
You may want to watch the first part of the video of Simons' interview and read this article.
I've been looking at several moving averages, but I'm thinking I'll just go with the 30-day Moving Average using a Close below as a down trend and vice versa.
Not perfect, but it should be a way to differentiate between an up trend and down trend environment. The idea being that market patterns are different in the two conditions.
Thoughts?