Sorry Fred. Can't see your posts, and not interested in seeing, what is probably just snark and no substance. Please stop following me around.
Following you? I was here first, asshole.
Sorry Fred. Can't see your posts, and not interested in seeing, what is probably just snark and no substance. Please stop following me around.
One of the few reasons to support Trump is that he drives liberals batshiat insane.
The summary Tsing Tao posted is spot on IMO.
This is what you guys say about every Republican, from Bachmann to Santorum to Ted Cruz. No matter who it is, you Cons will use the same excuse to love your lying pervert.
"Why not reflect on what you did wrong in the campaign that caused you to lose"...Leftists cannot admit they did anything wrong. Being the party of "intellectuals" prevents them from any sense of humility which would bring them to a conclusion that they might have made a mistake in backing a criminally corrupt, business as usual political hack like Clinton, when it was painfully obvious that the general population, both left and right, wanted something different this time around.I agree with most of the statements here by Cavuto. Trump is certainly a liar, and he makes ridiculous statements all the time. But it doesn't excuse the so-called "resistance" and all the pitiful actions the movement has taken. If Democrats were smart, they would let Trump collapse in on himself. The guy gives you plenty of things to go after that are true and obvious. It isn't necessary to make shit up on him! But instead, liberals fall all over themselves coming up with bullshit and warped views on real actions that they have left themselves with zero credibility.
Trump won the election, and that still chafes the liberal ass, but it's over. You're not getting him out before the end of his first term, so why not play the long game and just let the man be a one term President? Why not reflect on what you did wrong in the campaign that caused you to lose (God, there are sooo many things to fix - or better yet, not try to "fix") in the first place? Instead of looking to the past with asinine issues like Russian collusion or suing Wikileaks or other shithead tactics that make people look at the Democratic party and laugh, why not focus on real issues that Americans - the ones the Democrats repeatedly refer to as "deplorables" (yeah, that wins you votes) - and attack those issues so that the people who have dug their heels in for Trump start to go, "wait a second, the Democrats are actually working to do some of these things while Trump is nothing but bluster?"
Trump is an idiot. No question. But never has there been a more apropos expression for this situation with the Democrats as "Never argue with an idiot in public. People watching won't be able to discern you from the idiot."
Do you really think that Bachmann, Santorum, or Ted Cruz really drive liberals batshiat insane the way Trump does?
I don't think so. That would make him look bad. He'll do whatever it takes to avoid exactly that. Let him have his bravado.I could go on but in truth we will be lucky to avoid a major, nationwide disaster under his watch.
Do you really think that Bachmann, Santorum, or Ted Cruz really drive liberals batshiat insane the way Trump does?
I don't think so. That would make him look bad. He'll do whatever it takes to avoid exactly that. Let him have his bravado.
Hell he's got Kim ready to sign a peace treaty and put to rest a 65 year old armistice agreement.
He already looks bad, and is trying to pin blame on anyone and everyone but himself.I don't think so. That would make him look bad. He'll do whatever it takes to avoid exactly that. Let him have his bravado.
Really? Trump did that? Was it the Rocket Man or Bigger Button strategy that cinched the deal? Or was it calling Kim short and fat? This high-level diplomacy stuff can be so confusing.Hell he's got Kim ready to sign a peace treaty and put to rest a 65 year old armistice agreement.
I dunno. (shrugs)He already looks bad, and is trying to pin blame on anyone and everyone but himself.
Really? Trump did that? Was it the Rocket Man or Bigger Button strategy that cinched the deal? Or was it calling Kim short and fat? This high-level diplomacy stuff can be so confusing.
