Stat Question: L-Moments vs Normal Moments

The statistics that we normally use, standard deviation, skew, and kurtosis, are all highly sensitive to outliers. There sensitivity comes from their using high powers of a deviation. If there are are couple of outliers, the contribution pull everything. With L-Moments, only the first order of the data is used so it is not so sensitive to outliers.

From Wikipedia,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-moment
As summary statistics for data, L-moments provides many advantages. As an example consider a dataset with a few data points and one outlying data value. If the ordinary standard deviation of this data set is taken it will be highly influenced by this one point: however, if the L-scale is taken it will be far less sensitive to this data value. Consequently L-moments are far more meaningful when dealing with outliers in data than conventional moments. One example of this is using L-moments as summary statistics in extreme value theory (EVT).

Another advantage L-moments have over conventional moments is that their existence only requires the random variable to have finite mean, so the L-moments exist even if the higher conventional moments do not exist (for example, for Student's t distribution with low degrees of freedom). A finite variance is required in addition in order for the standard errors of estimates of the L-moments to be finite.

Some appearances of L-moments in the statistical literature include the book by David & Nagaraja (2003, Section 9.9) and a number of papers. A number of favourable comparisons of L-moments with ordinary moments have been reported.

Has anyone tried using L-Moments with market data?
 
Quote from Steven.Davis:


Has anyone tried using L-Moments with market data?


I haven't, but looks interesting!

If you are trying to deal with outliers, there are other ways, for example random forests have been shown to be less susceptible to outliers.

If you are considering different distributions, look into fat-tailed distributions. Outliers can be clumped together. For example the VIX has been riding high for some time now. In other words, for a period in time, the outliers become more likely, and therefore shouldn't be reduced/ignored. Maybe L-Moments takes care of this? The mention of EVT (Extreme Value Theory) suggests that this might be the case.
 
It depends on the objectives. Let as consider this problem: you have 1000 measurements at around 1.0 and 30 more at around 10.0. Should you consider the latter outliers?
 
Thank you for the pointer, but Extreme Value Theory isn't a good fit in this case.

I have bimodal data with noise. At the moment, I am looking for a measure of how much time is spent in each mode. Sometimes there are spikes and sometimes not. If I could assume that there would be spikes, I could use the fourth-moment kurtosis to make a Bayesian argument to identify the modes and judge their relative strength. Without knowing that, I need a metric like kurtosis which isn't so sensitive to spikes.
 
Back
Top