. I prefer so called market's action (patterns and volume if one prefers but it is too restrictive to say that since it can be patterns in abstract sense like in chaos theory) than indicators because it's more fundamental although it has been dismissed by "modern" TA gurus because it is so appealing to the mass public and they even pretend that indicators are more "scientific" because they are based on statistics - whereas academics have clearly showed that historical quotes exhibit no autocorrelation at all so that it is a lie to pretend that indicators are scientific in general : this just prove that they don't understand what statistics are about ... I will soon make a thread about that in relation in fact with the thread "Arcsinus law: distinguishing trend from persistency of chance" http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22256
. I must first finish the prob Faqs http://www.econometric-wave.com/faqs/probability/home.html.htmlQuote from cwjcntr:
Ok... I realize I still have a LOT to learn when it comes to TA.
What are some recommendations and resources to begin learning not only about how to choose an indicator, but to give you some understanding of how the indicator really works? Any books on the matter?
thx
-cj
Quote from brisvegas:
all i can say is get into multiple time frame fib levels . i have done the whole gammit of indicators and have found this the most extraordinary method of predicting future price moves and pivots. have a look at this site . it might help
http://datafeeds.com.au/amtrade.html
........................ bris
Quote from NUTSNEAL:
Looks like maybe you should be mentoring others!!!![]()
![]()
http://charts.cedrick.net/charts/qqq121503.txt
I am going to PM you.
Quote from cwjcntr:
I have been using MACD, but I'm sure I haven't been using it
properly.