We also had two systems that were in the market. We also traded the same systems on all commodites, though optimized for their respective parameters.I wish it was that simple, we trade 20+ systems at a time, one of our best performing system, had some bugs in the code that we found after 6 months, fixed them, got chopped up, put the old version back, works like a charm.
Put up an option system, based on valuation, probably the most researched, proven system we ever developed, chopped to pieces.
You never know, and I guess I am old enough to realize I don't have to.
Originally posted by nitro
No options stuff - just straight futures. Interesting that one can trade options mechanically - I would guess that would be arb type stuff, and I gotta believe that the opportunities there are far between...
nitro
...Contrary to popular belief, we have found that systems designed for a specific opportunity, in a specific market perform better than systems that can be cross traded....

Nitro,
...just an idea, you may look into synthetic long/short with options, it gives you the same risk profile as long/short stock, but it cost nothing (comparing to go long or short on real stock)
Cheers! Spring is here !!
Originally posted by nitro
Interesting again. I have been out of the "system building/100% mechanical trading" for a while. We believed that the best thing was to never look at the data. That we should, _IDEALLY_ figure out from first principles what should work, write the system, and trade it. Needless to say, that dillusion died fast. We finally decided to "punish" ourselves everytime we ran an optimization, or in more broad terms, (re)looked at the data. This was in order to prevent us from us from curve fitting. In the end, we took the approach that unless the system could trade several markets with five to ten rules (and walk-forward) we scraped it. We then also hit on the idea of having more than one system in the market at the same time in order to smooth out the equity curve.
We did well. I do not know how they are doing now. It is interesting that you tailor each system for a corresponding underlying.
I have always been fascinated with options. I "dabble" in them now, but mostly when I wouldn't mind owning a stock at some price I write the put. Not very complicated, but it is an extra source of income.
I am looking into arbitraging long put butterflies and long call butterflies against each other. I know it's naive, but I gotta start somewhere
I talked to Shelly Natenberg and he seemed to think that the best option traders are the ones that are also the best "underlying" traders as well.
nitro