>>.....(ignoring management fees here which are typically 1-2% of assets).....<<
I sincerely hope this doesn't spontaneously combust, but why would anyone "ignore" those fees? Fidelity, Vanguard, Putnam, et al, have grown absolutely huge from them. For that matter, many HF managers have grown pretty fat from management fees alone. Funny thing is the vast majority of them (both HF and MF managers) don't even beat the relevant benchmark yet still rake in the fees. I don't think any analysis of different approaches could be even-handed without taking management fees into consideration.
I sincerely hope this doesn't spontaneously combust, but why would anyone "ignore" those fees? Fidelity, Vanguard, Putnam, et al, have grown absolutely huge from them. For that matter, many HF managers have grown pretty fat from management fees alone. Funny thing is the vast majority of them (both HF and MF managers) don't even beat the relevant benchmark yet still rake in the fees. I don't think any analysis of different approaches could be even-handed without taking management fees into consideration.