Quote from ktm:
This is from page two of this thread. I wrote this 4 years ago and it still applies today. This thread was created as I was starting my firm - the purpose being to communicate with others who knew the business. This thread isn't about me, but since the legitimacy of starting small has been questioned repeatedly, maybe it's time I provide an update since so much time has passed.
Originally, I was asked to go in with a partner who was more of a financial advisor than money manager. That didn't work out and I started my own firm several years ago.
The experience has been very rewarding. My firm is successful well beyond my expectations, with last years performance being in about the 5th percentile of funds listed in the major databases. We have added clients and increased AUM exponentially. This is not some "friends and family" venture thrown together as a hobby. None of my clients are relatives or friends from anywhere except through the business. I spent nearly 18 months and many tens of thousands on legal, accounting and other setup to get this going. I still spend an annual fortune on audits, legal, accounting and regulatory upkeep...and I wouldn't trade it for any other job in the world.
Just because I don't have a Wall St pedigree and didn't raise 500M out of the gate doesn't make my (or any other) fund less legitimate. I could cite many who have started very very small and grown to 9 figures or more with hard work and solid performance.
This is NOT a debate about prop vs. hedge fund. There is an entire section of threads on this site for prop trading that has Don's firm clearly flashing as the sponsor. I would guess that there aren't HF guys going into the prop threads accosting prop guys over there and I would hope we can keep this thread on topic going forward.
Thanks
ktm