Quote from lescor:
So to illustrate: 3% on $975k= 29,250/yr. 15% on $850k= 127,500/yr. 156,750/12= about $13k/month to hold a million dollars every day with a $25k account. Pretty good deal for the house.
Let's take this further.
Say you earn 30% a year on the $1 million. That' $300K of trading gains, less $127.5K of carrying costs. That's a profit of roughtly $170K that you keep. You bear all the downside risk.
Losing your initial $25K deposit on a $1 million account wouldn't be too difficult I think.
On the other hand, let's say you have a $1 million hedge fund. to keep the math simple, let's say there are no additional cost to running the hedge fund.
You make 30%, or $300K of gains for the year, and you keep 20% of it as your performance fee. That's $60K for you.
You also charge 1% fee per year, which would be roughly $10K.
All together, you earn $70K for your efforts, but you have no downside risk.
So do you take $70K with no downside risk, or $170K with significant downside risk.
If you are able to scale up your hedge fund to $3m or more, clearly a hedge fund would be a better deal than prop tradin from a reward to risk perspective.
Of course, the fixed costs in your hedge fund, which I assume to be zero here, would require a larger asset base in order to cover those fixed costs. There's still some level of assets, under a hedge fund, that would be more attractive than prop trading.
What do you think of my back of the envelope calculations
-- mmm