Start a fund

I read a similar study a while back and decided to replicate..

2000-2013 With the benefit of hindsight....If you required the market
to pay you $50k yr. you would have needed to invest $5mm. But you
would have been in drawdown twice -$2.5mm. "Where is the retail investor"? maybe there afraid to bet $50 to earn $1 ...inflation during this period has been avg 2.7% yr.
 

Attachments

Quote from newwurldmn:

you are going to meet a had of a bulge bracket bank to discuss starting a fund with 3 year track record on 100,000 AUM?
More...


I understand what you mean. In fact I believe the firm in question, like many BB firms are less likely to fund a new manager. They have an interest in a program/ strategy mix that I developed that is very scalable in SP500 names.

My tracking performance like stated >$100k but as an example FOREX
i see the inside EURJPY with IB now spread for 2 pips and $3mm size on inside. Even $100k could size 30x with zero to little slippage.

I understand part2...If I were trading $50mm of my own funds, this means little on how I could handle your $50mm.

Thank you though , I do appreciate your point.
 
Yes, I did start a fund by myself 2008 and shut it down in 2010..
on my terms. I was guilty of trying to do everything myself.. To do it
right you need a team. (sales, compliance, IT ).
 
Quote from bwolinsky:

Not sure anybody's interested if SP500 is up over 20% YTD and you're underperforming.

All of it is definitely un-polished. Need more spectacular results and no you should not tell them that, just what your results did.

What was the outperformance since 2010? Was it over 50%?
More...

But here you go again......typical retail trader mind-set...if someone told me they are up 2.5X the averages i'd like to know how that was achieved.

i know it was by taking bigger risks..fine..as long as you do not try to B*S*me
 
Quote from RockMachine:

Cagr 37% since 2010 max dd 24% aum> $100k. Handsomily since 08 but no longer trade as I did 08-09. Sp500 has been averaging 1% yr since 2000 with 2 50% drawdowns.
More...

well you probably shouldn't offer that system.. because it sucks...

secondly people don't invest based on performance, they invest in people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top