Staggers The Imagination That Nominee For VP Doesn't Know What The 'Bush Doctrine' Is

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I don't care that you think she is a female version of Buchanan or why you are voting for her.

You vote for ideology over competence, that is the main point.

This is exactly the formula that was applied to 2 disastrous terms for Bush, ideology and image over competency.

You are the type who puts ideology over what is best for our country.

News flash. The election is McCain versus Obama, not Palin versus Obama. The funny thing is that either way, obama comes in second in a test of competency. His appeal is purely cosmetic.
 
That is a valid argument.

However, mental competency is a big issue when it comes to McBush.

I am happy now that you are going to talk only about the greatness of McBush...

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

News flash. The election is McCain versus Obama, not Palin versus Obama. The funny thing is that either way, obama comes in second in a test of competency. His appeal is purely cosmetic.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

An honest direct person if they didn't know what the Bush doctrine was, when asked:

"Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine?"

Would have responded:

"What is the Bush Doctrine you are referring to?"

That's not what Palin said. She tried to "handle" the question without appearing ignorant.

Palin tried to pretend she knew what the Bush Doctrine was by responding:

"In what respect?"

You don't answer a question with "In what respect" if you don't know what the Bush Doctrine is.

You're clearly ignorant of the realities of politics. This suggestion is yet another example of the contemptible pie-in-the-sky theorizing that characterizes the worst elements of the radical left.

By the way, I've noticed that lately, you've lost the ability to organize your written thoughts in paragrapaph form. This is clearly indicative of a (further) breakdown in your ability to formulate cogent arguments.
 
The Bolsheviks don't like her:

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/12-09-2008/106354-palindevil-0
______________________
Sarah Palin, Mrs. Nobody know-it-all shreiking cow from Alaska, the joke of American politics, plied with a couple of vodkas before letting rip in front of incredulous audiences while McCain coos in the background, cuts a ridiculous figure as she strives to be taken seriously.




How can anyone whose husband is a member of the Alaska Independence Party and who is running for the Vice Presidency of the Union be taken seriously?
________________________________

And have you not forgotten, you pith-headed little bimbo from the back of beyond, that small detail about the slaughter of Russian citizens by Georgians, which started the whole debacle? So next time suppose you keep your mouth shut and while you’re at it, make sure the members of your family keep their legs shut too. Your country has enough failed mothers as it is.
_______________________________

I hate f*cking commies. Should I vote for her?
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Wanna know something CO. I was a GOP Committeeman, Congressional candidate and over all fan of politics and I don't know what it is.

As if America pre-emptively attacking other nations unprovoked is something new.

Last history I read said Germany (twice), Korea and Vietnam had never attacked America first either. Democrat's lost us 600,000 American men fighting in those interventionist wars. Wilson and FDR are regarded as hero's. Good thing the victors write history.

A properly worded question would've been, "Governor, President Bush has employed an ideology-some call it The Bush Doctrine-that nations who threaten the United States should be pre-emptively attacked. Do you agree with the President's position?"

Right on the money, and supported with facts as usual. Phrasing the question to make their favorites look like idiots, or geniuses, is what "journalists" do.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

News flash. The election is McCain versus Obama, not Palin versus Obama. The funny thing is that either way, obama comes in second in a test of competency. His appeal is purely cosmetic.

My theory is, while Obama and his gang complain about all the Palin news, in truth they secretly want the voters to think of the election as Obama vs. Palin. Obama vs. Mac is a hands down victory for republicans. What they don't want to face is that Palin brings as much experience to the table as Obama, which is damn little.
When Mac and his team made this pick I thought it was a dumb, desperate move. Posted that opinion too. Now it looks like pure genius.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Wanna know something CO. I was a GOP Committeeman, Congressional candidate and over all fan of politics and I don't know what it is.


Wanna know something I knew what it was and I'm not the political junkie you guys are but I think most of us knew exactly what Gibson was referring to by the "Bush doctrine". Didn't you know what he meant when you heard the question? Does her causal remarks about military conflict with Russia scare anyone but me? I know she was talking out her ass and hasn't given it more than a few minutes of thought. And probably when the chips are on the line she wouldn't send American troops to Georgia to fight Russia, but I'm not willing to take that chance and none of you should either. Pisses me off McCain chose her, for all his patriot talk, picking Palin shows he cares more about his ambition than he cares about America.
 
Quote from bigarrow:

Wanna know something I knew what it was and I'm not the political junkie you guys are but I think most of us knew exactly what Gibson was referring to by the "Bush doctrine". Didn't you know what he meant when you heard the question? Does her causal remarks about military conflict with Russia scare anyone but me? I know she was talking out her ass and hasn't given it more than a few minutes of thought. And probably when the chips are on the line she wouldn't send American troops to Georgia to fight Russia, but I'm not willing to take that chance and none of you should either. Pisses me off McCain chose her, for all his patriot talk, picking Palin shows he cares more about his ambition than he cares about America.

You realize her remarks were correct. If Georgia were to be in NATO we'd be contratually obligated (along with ALL of the other NATO members) to fight for Georgia. What do you know about Obama and Pakistan? That's 10x more relevant than the VP, Georgia and NATO.

I don't know about you but Obama scares me WAY MORE than Sarah:

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Accusing Pakistan of misusing the massive American aid to fight the war on terror, Democratic nominee for the U.S. Presidential election Barack Obama, in a sensational comment, has said Islamabad was using these funds for “preparing for a war against India.”


http://www.indiajournal.com/pages/event.php?id=4476


How nice for an American friggin' nominee to be throwing around innuendo involving not one but TWO nations with nuclear weapons.

This guy is numero uno jaggoff.
 
Pabst, your right, and that is one reason why allowing Georgia into NATO should be thought through, not just gung ho, lets fight for all democracies. I think Obama is a typical politician, and thus lies and says what he has to say to get what he wants. But I don't think he is on a moral crusade. I think for all his talk he is a pragmatist and an opportunist but a very smart one. But now that Palin is in the mix we have a potential moral crusader. I don't know if she is or not but the chance is there that she is and again I'm not willing to take that chance. So right or wrong, I'm more afraid of Palin than I am Obama.
And her interview did not give me any more confidence in her at all. But the not know the Bush doctrine thing isn't a big deal, she just handled it badly, still no big deal. It would of been cool if she would of said "what is the Bush doctrine?" but I can understand why she didn't.
 
Quote from bigarrow:

Pabst, your right, and that is one reason why allowing Georgia into NATO should be thought through, not just gung ho, lets fight for all democracies. I think Obama is a typical politician, and thus lies and says what he has to say to get what he wants. But I don't think he is on a moral crusade. I think for all his talk he is a pragmatist and an opportunist but a very smart one. But now that Palin is in the mix we have a potential moral crusader. I don't know if she is or not but the chance is there that she is and again I'm not willing to take that chance. So right or wrong, I'm more afraid of Palin than I am Obama.
And her interview did not give me any more confidence in her at all. But the not know the Bush doctrine thing isn't a big deal, she just handled it badly, still no big deal. It would of been cool if she would of said "what is the Bush doctrine?" but I can understand why she didn't.

She didn't want to appear stupid. She did anyways. You might remember at the onset of the interview she mentioned that her interest is in reforming government and not foreign policy. That's refreshing stuff to me. I see her as a militant Pat Buchanan type who has no alliance to AIPAC and the American war machine. Ever since FDR we've been electing Presidents based on who they'd war with and how well they'd do it. We've been sucking hind tit ever since. I want a middle class thinking common sense governing leader.
 
Back
Top