Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Futures Trading Journal
- Thread starter Spydertrader
- Start date
- Status
From My later observations I think that Demand is leading and supply is Lagging... thats why the price is moving Up or Down ...
I am looking Ask Size and Bid Size... If Ask size > Bid Size for me that is demand ( market buy orders) for Ask price is greater than demand ( sell orders) for Bid price...If I have confirmation from T&S for me this means Price is going Up...If Ask size > Bid size and T&S show that Bid price is bombed for me this is a Wall signal and the price is going Down to China Town....
P.S. I am looking for this signals only on FTT 's or LTL , RTL and I am looking for YM, ES ask sizes vS YM,ES bid sizes
Syllabus for this month includes video examples.
I have some from past months that I had posted.
So to get the month started, I put together a link to all the past videos to make it easy.
Open link and scroll to bottom, from there you can select.
I'll add some more video's as the month continues.
Video link : http://www.screencast.com/t/mfs0aFJyo
I have some from past months that I had posted.
So to get the month started, I put together a link to all the past videos to make it easy.
Open link and scroll to bottom, from there you can select.
I'll add some more video's as the month continues.
Video link : http://www.screencast.com/t/mfs0aFJyo
Just a quick note. Clocked out on an edit of what I just posted.
The video's that I posted, is just what I had been working on at the time.
I am sure Spyder has something different in mind.
So just to clarify, this is just video posts that I had added to the journal.
Have a great day !
The video's that I posted, is just what I had been working on at the time.
I am sure Spyder has something different in mind.
So just to clarify, this is just video posts that I had added to the journal.
Have a great day !
cnms2,
Indeed that's what it is all about. Being open to being stimulated by others to think, is a trait that serves us all well.
If I have understood what you said, a Gaussian-inspired channel retrofit is simply a reflection of the commutative nature of the equality: Gaussian profile = channel profile. In contrast the equality: FTT = point 1 is not commutative. If this babble is nonsensical, please deposit it in the nearest Waring blendor with a setting appropriate for connective tissue.
Your posts and insights are synaptically pleasing. Keep up the good work.
lj
Indeed that's what it is all about. Being open to being stimulated by others to think, is a trait that serves us all well.
If I have understood what you said, a Gaussian-inspired channel retrofit is simply a reflection of the commutative nature of the equality: Gaussian profile = channel profile. In contrast the equality: FTT = point 1 is not commutative. If this babble is nonsensical, please deposit it in the nearest Waring blendor with a setting appropriate for connective tissue.
Your posts and insights are synaptically pleasing. Keep up the good work.
lj
I am suffering from some confusion regarding formations and laterals. If others are in a similar state of confusion, I hope the replies to this post prove helpful.
Let me start with what I (believe I) am clear on. The requirements for the formation of an FBP, FTP and SYM Pennant and laterals.
(FBP= Same bottoms with lower high on second bar, frequently a flaw; FTP= reverse of FBP; Sym = Outside Bar followed by smaller inside bar(s) that may or not be "centered" on first Out Bar; lateral= an Outside bar.
Questions
1. Is the above information correct?
2. Is a lateral the same as a Sym Pennant just that there is no official BO of the lateral until a break of its (the OB) exteremes?
3. To properly BO from any of a FBP or an FTP do we need a close outside the "flat" line or merely a break of either side of them?
4. To officially BO a Sym Pennant do we need a close outside the parameters of the second smaller bar or again just a break of its parameters?
5. Is there ever a second bar in any formation that is too big to draw boundaries around?
This should get me started. Any views on the subject would be mucho appreciated.
Let me start with what I (believe I) am clear on. The requirements for the formation of an FBP, FTP and SYM Pennant and laterals.
(FBP= Same bottoms with lower high on second bar, frequently a flaw; FTP= reverse of FBP; Sym = Outside Bar followed by smaller inside bar(s) that may or not be "centered" on first Out Bar; lateral= an Outside bar.
Questions
1. Is the above information correct?
2. Is a lateral the same as a Sym Pennant just that there is no official BO of the lateral until a break of its (the OB) exteremes?
3. To properly BO from any of a FBP or an FTP do we need a close outside the "flat" line or merely a break of either side of them?
4. To officially BO a Sym Pennant do we need a close outside the parameters of the second smaller bar or again just a break of its parameters?
5. Is there ever a second bar in any formation that is too big to draw boundaries around?
This should get me started. Any views on the subject would be mucho appreciated
.- Status