Quote from dkm:
Unfortunately, when trying to identify an FTT, as in my example on p826, price does not BO on increasing volume. By definition, we wish to see reducing volume as price returns to the RTL. How is one supposed to handle colour oscillation in this situation?
I have my 'pages' set to 40 posts per page. As a result, I do not have 856 pages, so a link to your post, or a screen shot of the exact bars referenced would help a great deal. Until then, maybe this will help (maybe it won't, but I hope it does).
A Pennant forms on decreasing Volume. As a result, the second bar in the Pennant Formation, often has significantly lower Volume than the previous bar. As such, it becomes
very difficult for the subsequent bar to
not show increasing Volume of the Pennant Formation Second (or subsequent, if the formation has more than 2) Bar. Why care about Pennants? Ask yourself what
for sure constitutes
change. Every time, without a doubt, you can always see it, never a mistake
change. Draw it out on a piece of paper. Now, how do Pennants differ from this "yes, I damn well do know it" example of change?
If it helps, draw out an example of
continuation (Every time, without a doubt, you can always see it, never a mistake ) bar by bar.
Then draw the
change example. At some point, you
have to know you have change after continuation. What is that point? I am not speaking about FTT's or FBO's or any 'vocabulary' words. What tells you when you monitor that you have
change?
Pennants provide the time where we, as traders, can gather our thoughts and determine what must happen next.
At some point in a developing bar, price sits at a point in time where
only certain things can occur next. As time passes, and the market eliminates possibilities we eventually arrive at a point in time where
only one thing remains. (We did this with Flaws a while back) At some point in time (before we reach the 'one thing' moment), even the several remaining possibilities mean the same thing - either continuation or change.
It is here, where we take action.
By example, consider holding a short position in a down channel. Price heads lower rapidly stopping just before the LTL, and then, Price comes up slightly (2 or 3 tics) off the low after bouncing off a smallish DOM wall (you might not even have seen the wall or even use the DOM as a tool - doesn't matter). You begin to think, "Hmmmmmm. Possible FTT right here. Did I miss something? Is this just normal Intra-bar volatility?" Before you can sort out the answers, the bar closes and the next bar opens inside the previous bar. Of course, its color flips between black and red, creating all sorts of stress, and about every other second, the Price bar starts to look like one of them there Doji Star thing-a-ma-bobs. Over time you notice that Price 'seems' to spend more time red than black. You remember the 'Formations discussion' and think, "OK, Sym Pennant, so I wait."
Before you can even arrive at
continuation or
change, Price
must transition (even if for only a brief moment) to an FTP or an FBP before you can have a
for sure change event. Jack has talked about this many times with his 'market Matrix' discussions. The market cannot jump around. It does not ever (OK, I
did see this
once on February 27, 2007, but that was surely an extreme day) run super fast in one direction, and then, come to a screeching halt. The market transitions from one mode to the next, so
segment it off, and then, look for the signals. You already do this intuitively with channels.
Bottom line, if you can differentiate (now with the assistance of formations) between the market modes, you do not need to know when you have an FTT. You simply need to know continuation or change. Hence, next months discussion on "Additional Signals for Change" on the Syllabus. work through the formations first, and then, see if that doesn't help you to catch FTT's - even on the coarse level. Later, you'll be able to watch the YM for your 'signal for change' and know (in advance) the direction of the ES formation BO.
Really cool stuff.
- Spydertrader