Quote from bundlemaker:
I'd like to point something else out to the group, as Spyder brought it up in one of his posts in reply to me this evening. I had never intended on saying this publicly, but his suggestion that I saw live in Tucson somthing akin to what I feel is necessary is just plane false.
While in Tucson, not once was any trading ever done. Spyder or Jack would just say aloud what they saw. But no decision points were EVER logged that I could see. And when something actionable occurred, no real followthrough happened on the analysis. If you listen to the video, you'd quickly realize why I've been almost begging for some demonstration, because I've still yet to see how this works.
Brain surgeons do not learn this way. Attorneys don't. Sales people don't. Landscapers don't. Engineers don't. Shall I go on? Are you really telling us Spyder that out of all the professions and crafts of the world, that trading is the one thing that learning by example and demonstration in real time is the exception?
If you had just said upfront, "hey guys, here's the info, make of it what you can, I'll try and respond when I can" that would have been very, very different indeed. BUt no, you posed as someone who made an agreement to pass on the information. YOu created a formal syllabus. You spent a TON of time with me and others on a personal basis. You set it up so we expected a lot out of you. And now, some of us are so hungry, in no small part, because you have told us how great this can be. But you've never shown us.
I'm not one of those trolls who goes around trying to disprove anything. I have never been mean spirited (maybe a bit confrontational, but never with malice). I admit I have many flaws.
On the other hand, I'm wondering how successful you feel this whole project will have been if so many, who have struggled so hard (you told me I have worked harder at this than anyone you know) still can't get it, and you're still unwilling to show how it's done (show, not explain).
Many have privately asked about my experience in Tucson. I always had good things to say, but was also uncomfortable when asked about actual trading or real time analysis.
Well, it looks like my days with Spyder are numbered, so I may as well tell the world, nothing remotely like what a person would need to do to trade was ever done in my presense. If you don't believe me, maybe ProCrast can post the Monday morning video which ostensibly was going to be "live trading".
Over the past few weeks I've used the word contradiction. I apologize for using a word I never intened to. YOu may not believe this, but I have some significant health issues that does effect my level of concentration, among other things. You immediatley assumed I was ignoring you. Well, your wrong.
The word I wanted was congruency, or rather, incongruency. No matter what you say, much of it comes to me as incongruent. Not right or wrong, incongruent. Not good or bad, open or hiding, plus or minus, incongruent. And it's damn hard to learn from incongruency.
As stuck as you suggest I am, I think your just as stuck in the way you're approaching teaching this.