Quote from nkhoi:
I will take easy one.![]()
Quote from bundlemaker:
I have studied many of Spyders charts, and a large % of his pt3's (perhaps not half, but much more than 1/4) do not occurr on increasing volume.
. [/B]
Quote from Bearbelly:
Many point threes are not identified until after they happen. BUT you enter the ones that have increasing volume . I hope you dont think you can identify and trade every point 3.
p.s. You MUST take into account the pace of the market. A point three in the middle of a range has nowhere near the potential of a point three off a new high or low.
Quote from bundlemaker:
LMAOROLF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, call me super duper idiot. I take things literally. For all this time, I thought that was the forest level rules. As I saw no discussion on filtering out various types of point 3's.
Bear, not sure if I follow you on the other idea. You mean a pt3 down near the upper portion of the day's range? If so, that makes sense to me. Is there anyway you use to filter out all the pt3's that occurr like this on a trend day up (for example) counter to the main trend of the day?
Quote from bundlemaker:
This is what I meant, some time back, about contradictions. It was a poorly chosen word. It comes down to this...
Quote from bundlemaker:
You mean a pt3 down near the upper portion of the day's range? If so, that makes sense to me. Is there anyway you use to filter out all the pt3's that occur like this on a trend day up (for example) counter to the main trend of the day? [/B]

Quote from bundlemaker:
LMAOROLF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, call me super duper idiot. I take things literally. For all this time, I thought that was the forest level rules. As I saw no discussion on filtering out various types of point 3's.
Bear, not sure if I follow you on the other idea. You mean a pt3 down near the upper portion of the day's range? If so, that makes sense to me. Is there anyway you use to filter out all the pt3's that occurr like this on a trend day up (for example) counter to the main trend of the day?
Quote from Spydertrader:
1. You were also told about what to do during times of significantly low volume (DU, VDU), but you chose to ignore that advice. The point at which nkhoi outlined your 'contradiction' the volume levels are so low, even Mak explained why we avoid trading these levels, but you ignored that advice as well, and instead, chose to see a 'contradiction' on the chart.
2. You first circled Point Three occurs at what time of a carryover channel? I provided advice and instruction with respect to volume after 4:00 PM. You've ignored that as well and decided another contradiction exists.
3. With respect to 'formations' and volume, I also provided detailed instruction on what happens when price closes within the formation. You ignored that advice as well, and again, see only contradiction.
4. 11:25 to 11:30 shows increasing volume even with the intrabar gaussian shift which occurred at 11:25. Again, I have posted detailed advice on how one needs to view these intra-bar changes in sentiment, but you still see this as contradictions.
5. The green 'forest level' channel encompasses the entire day - which includes a Volume pace drop off into the lunch hour. Numerous posts from all sorts of individuals across every Futures discussion thread discuses the noon hour volume pace change, yet you see another 'contradiction.
6. Next time someone advises 'taking a break' you should do exactly that. Logging on to read ET while on sabbatical, doesn't exactly sound like 'taking a break and not thinking about this stuff.'
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1610357>
- Spydertrader