Quote from David I:
I'm in "january" with where I am with the syllabus just to put things in perspective.
I think I'm getting faster at making pretty colored and annotated charts but I chuckle thinking to myself that "I make pretty colored charts" is what I'm getting good at and I'm wondering when I get lost ... or I don't know for sure if I'm doing this right (until the end of the day when I compare/correct/redraw based on Spyder's charts).
I've got to attend to other things but this is my pretty colored chart up to 11:25 or so.
Many people comment that we should post our charts so we might get feedback. I am interested in getting some of that feedback. Also it has been pointed out (and makes much sense) that a new comer should just make sure that their charts look like Spyder's at the end of the day - and I do my work after the end of the day working to correct and make them be that way.
For me on this chart things just seem messy and unsure from about 10:20 to 11:25 - so I don't know if I've captured it OK or if there are flaws I have yet to learn about so I should just consider it all continuation until I learn more or if I just am blindsided and missed something more important.
Thanks for any comments / feedback if you have them.
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1534128>
- David
David..
That looks pretty good for where you are in the journals. Remember to disregard the channels once price breaks out on increasing volume. You'll see that price action doesnt exactly follow your orange and pink channels because you recycled pt 1 of a previous channel. Doing this gives you alot of "FTT's" where there really shouldnt be. Keep at it and you will be happy you did. Nice work -- hope this helps
John
, I now (each day) annotate 5-minute charts for the NQ and ER in addition to the ES and YM.