Quote from EstebanUno:
Gaussians are inconsistent, I'll study them later. It's a result of reading the "Golden Post", where JH says every flaw, including hitches should be drawn in the gaussians. Still digesting the idea.
Quote from Pr0crast:
I'm finding that when I use it correctly, the DOM adds a very unique level of comfort to a trade. When I'm at a gaussian trough, perhaps a potential PT3, and an 800 vs. 80 wall forms underneath the PT3, its very comforting getting an entry that almost negates the spread. Also makes a lot of washes a lot more obvious if an opposing wall forms.
Right on the mark. Seems to me that it is very important to get off the DOM as soon as the trade gets out of wash territory. It served its purpose, now look to the coarser tools.Quote from ivob:
I agree Pr0crast. I also feel very comfortable watching the DOM and keep on watching it for confirming and opposite signals the first few moments after taking the trade. If you're sharp chances for a loss are very low.
I did make the mistake though to keep on watching it. After price moves we move back to coarser tools, PRV, channels.
I do think (from observing) that the DOM only tells you where price will go for the next 2-3 ticks or so. However, on important moments (like after RTL break and we get VDU) these 2-3 ticks are exactly what it is about because other forces will do the rest after that.
regards,
Ivo
Quote from Pr0crast:
Seems to me that it is very important to get off the DOM as soon as the trade gets out of wash territory. It served its purpose, now look to the coarser tools.