Quote from Audkid1:
Spyder, I have a couple of Q's. I realize this is bug level stuff but I would like your reaction to this snapshot of this am's stretch/squeeze. At approximately 10:02 when the YM and ES shot up the stretch/squeeze had a negative spike. Was this an aboration? Does the stretch/squeeze always or sometimes follow the same direction as price? Is there an average amount of times that you would change the premium amount in a day? If today is an average example, it seems that it's wider in the morning and afternoon and smaller during the lunchtime drift. Is this correct? Or should I have some chocolate covered ants and not worry about it?
Stretch / Squeeze provides a signal for continuation or change.
Your attached chart of STR/SQU appears slightly skewed to the downside. During the timeframe presented all of your histogram bars head downward. This tells me the 'offset' used wasn't correct.
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1423505>
No "average number of times" exists for when one needs to 'reset' the offset during the day. Some days, the calculations require no reset. Other days, I have had to reset on 4 different occasions.
However, what you did see (even with a skewed offset) is STR/SQU providing two different signals within the same bar.
Quote from Spydertrader:
O.K. So where do we go from here? Spend some time monitoring STR/SQU through the day. Learn how it can provide two different signals within the same bar during periods of High Volatility. Note also, how such a fine level monitoring (Bug Level) currently sits far beyond our current focus. Take some notes to 'see' how STR/SQU acts around FTT's, Point Threes and Spike Bars. In other words, spend some time learning this new tool before working it into a regular position within your monitoring paradigm.
I would not consider today an 'average' day, and as such, I would not consider the number of resets needed for today to be average either.
As you can see, obtaining sufficient data sets, and then moving to the 'action' phase, prevents a trader from obtaining incorrect data. By example, one should not have needed to go very far beyond ES Price and Volume in order to determine continuation or change on the 10:00 AM Bar.
Later, when one has mastered the various levels of resolution, trading at the bug level (with the appropriate tools) permits the trader to trade within the bars.Thanks for providing an excellent example of how looking at the incorrect data at the incorrect time can cause a trader to 'see' change signals where, in reality, no such signals for change exist (except at 'fine' resolution levels).
- Spydertrader