OK, this may sound crazy unless you get what I'm talking about. If it clicks, this is for you, if it doesn't, place on back burner if you find yourself frustrated later.
When monitoring and annotating charts, we often, almost continuously, find ourselves having to identify something. "Is this increasing?" "Is this decreasing" etc etc. I find this a very difficult exercise, because usually the answer is not black and white. Uncertainty rules and then emotions can take over easily.
The solution is to give yourself a different question to ask. This can make all the difference in the world for some of you. Change the question from "is it this or that" to "is it more like this or more like that"? That might seem like a meaningless shift. It isn't. It takes your mind to a different place of reasoning. Try it.
In addition, try reversing the logic of your reasoning. Move from deduction to induction. Don't look at a piece of chart and ask "what does this mean". Instead try "if this is a point 3 of a new up channel, then volume should be doing such and such." Assume your conclusion is correct (instead of questioning yourself to death) and then ask what the data RIGHT NOW must be to support that conclusion.
This boils down to testing your conclusion with new data and keeps you in the NOW. Continuation.....change.....continuation....change. Use the thought process I just presented and it HAS to keep your mind on continuation versus change.
When monitoring and annotating charts, we often, almost continuously, find ourselves having to identify something. "Is this increasing?" "Is this decreasing" etc etc. I find this a very difficult exercise, because usually the answer is not black and white. Uncertainty rules and then emotions can take over easily.
The solution is to give yourself a different question to ask. This can make all the difference in the world for some of you. Change the question from "is it this or that" to "is it more like this or more like that"? That might seem like a meaningless shift. It isn't. It takes your mind to a different place of reasoning. Try it.
In addition, try reversing the logic of your reasoning. Move from deduction to induction. Don't look at a piece of chart and ask "what does this mean". Instead try "if this is a point 3 of a new up channel, then volume should be doing such and such." Assume your conclusion is correct (instead of questioning yourself to death) and then ask what the data RIGHT NOW must be to support that conclusion.
This boils down to testing your conclusion with new data and keeps you in the NOW. Continuation.....change.....continuation....change. Use the thought process I just presented and it HAS to keep your mind on continuation versus change.
